AI Article Synopsis

  • Almost 50% of people in the U.S., Italy, and Sweden have tattoos, leading to a 32% increase in tattoo removal demand since 2011, highlighting the limitations of traditional Q-switched laser methods that often require up to 20 sessions.
  • A study evaluated the effectiveness of a new short-pulsed Q-switched Nd:YAG laser for tattoo removal, showing it could significantly reduce the number of sessions needed to achieve satisfactory results.
  • Results indicated that this new method achieved better removal efficiency over time and required an average of only 5.09 sessions compared to the expected 9.9, with no serious side effects reported.

Article Abstract

Background: With nearly 50% of the population in the United States, Italy, and Sweden tattooed with at least one tattoo, the demand for its removal has risen by 32% since 2011. Traditional removal methods, such as Q-switched (QS) laser-based tattoo removal, can be lengthy, requiring up to 20 sessions.

Aim: This study presents a retrospective clinical evaluation of seven short-pulsed QS, dual-wavelength Nd:YAG laser, as an efficient alternative, that can potentially reduce the number of sessions needed as calculated by a founded scale.

Methods: The QS modality delivers high-intensity pulses in four wavelengths, ideal for removing multicolored tattoos, of which two were used. We studied 11 patients who underwent 3-8 treatments (average 5.09) every 2-3 months. Each tattoo was assessed using the Kirby-Desai scale, considering the following factors: location, Fitzpatrick skin type, ink amount, layering, scarring, tissue changes, and tattoo color. Follow-ups were conducted after 6 months and at 4-5 years following last session.

Results: The long-term follow-up presented a significantly higher tattoo removal efficiency than the short-term follow-up (p < 0.001), indicating a sustained process of ink breakdown and elimination. Notably, the actual number of treatments were significantly lower than that predicted by the Kirby-Desai scale (average 5.09 vs. 9.9, p < 0.001). No severe adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: In conclusion, the QS Nd:YAG laser offers a safe and effective alternative for tattoo removal, requiring fewer treatments than initially expected.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16201DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tattoo removal
12
retrospective clinical
8
clinical evaluation
8
ndyag laser
8
kirby-desai scale
8
tattoo
6
removal
5
evaluation q-switched
4
q-switched ndyag
4
laser safety
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!