Purpose: The explore the added value of peri-calcification regions on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as only calcification on routine mammogram.
Methods: Patients who underwent CEM because of suspicious calcification-only lesions were included. The test set included patients between March 2017 and March 2019, while the validation set was collected between April 2019 and October 2019. The calcifications were automatically detected and grouped by a machine learning-based computer-aided system. In addition to extracting radiomic features on both low-energy (LE) and recombined (RC) images from the calcification areas, the peri-calcification regions, which is generated by extending the annotation margin radially with gradients from 1 mm to 9 mm, were attempted. Machine learning (ML) models were built to classify calcifications into malignant and benign groups. The diagnostic matrices were also evaluated by combing ML models with subjective reading.
Results: Models for LE (significant features: wavelet-LLL_glcm_Imc2_MLO; wavelet-HLL_firstorder_Entropy_MLO; wavelet-LHH_glcm_DifferenceVariance_CC; wavelet-HLL_glcm_SumEntropy_MLO;wavelet-HLH_glrlm_ShortRunLowGray LevelEmphasis_MLO; original_firstorder_Entropy_MLO; original_shape_Elongation_MLO) and RC (significant features: wavelet-HLH_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized_MLO; wavelet-LLH_firstorder_10Percentile_CC; original_firstorder_Maximum_MLO; wavelet-HHH_glcm_Autocorrelation_MLO; original_shape_Elongation_MLO; wavelet-LHL_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized_MLO; wavelet-LLH_firstorder_RootMeanSquared_MLO) images were set up with 7 features. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of RC models are significantly better than those of LE models with compact and expanded boundary (RC v.s. LE, compact: 0.81 v.s. 0.73, p < 0.05; expanded: 0.89 v.s. 0.81, p < 0.05) and RC models with 3 mm boundary extension yielded the best performance compared to those with other sizes (AUC = 0.89). Combining with radiologists' reading, the 3mm-boundary RC model achieved a sensitivity of 0.871 and negative predictive value of 0.937 with similar accuracy of 0.843 in predicting malignancy.
Conclusions: The machine learning model integrating intra- and peri-calcification regions on CEM has the potential to aid radiologists' performance in predicting malignancy of suspicious breast calcifications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/XST-230332 | DOI Listing |
Breast Cancer Res Treat
November 2024
Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Haidian District, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Beijing, China.
J Xray Sci Technol
May 2024
Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China.
Purpose: The explore the added value of peri-calcification regions on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as only calcification on routine mammogram.
Methods: Patients who underwent CEM because of suspicious calcification-only lesions were included. The test set included patients between March 2017 and March 2019, while the validation set was collected between April 2019 and October 2019.
Acad Radiol
June 2024
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:
Rationale And Objectives: Little is known about the factors affecting the Artificial Intelligence (AI) software performance on mammography for breast cancer detection. This study was to identify factors associated with abnormality scores assigned by the AI software.
Materials And Methods: A retrospective database search was conducted to identify consecutive asymptomatic women who underwent breast cancer surgery between April 2016 and December 2019.
Ann Vasc Surg
November 2022
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Background: Anatomic details affecting the adverse outcomes following carotid artery stenting have not been well characterized. We compared in-hospital outcomes following transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients stratified by degree of lesion calcification and aortic arch type.
Methods: Data from patients in the Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Quality Initiative database undergoing TCAR (January 2017 to April 2020) or TFCAS (May 2005 to April 2020) and had non-missing grading on carotid artery calcification or aortic arch type was analyzed.
Eur J Radiol
January 2021
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, United States. Electronic address:
Rationale And Objective: Use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast imaging has necessitated DBT-guided biopsy, however, a single DBT acquisition may result in a greater radiation dose than a single DM acquisition. Our objective was to compare the number of images acquired and the resulting radiation dose of DBT versus DM-guided breast biopsies.
Method: All biopsies performed on our DM unit from 8/2016 to 1/2017 and on our DM-DBT unit from 8/2017 to 1/2018 were retrospectively reviewed.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!