Peri-lesion regions in differentiating suspicious breast calcification-only lesions specifically on contrast enhanced mammography.

J Xray Sci Technol

Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China.

Published: May 2024

Purpose: The explore the added value of peri-calcification regions on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as only calcification on routine mammogram.

Methods: Patients who underwent CEM because of suspicious calcification-only lesions were included. The test set included patients between March 2017 and March 2019, while the validation set was collected between April 2019 and October 2019. The calcifications were automatically detected and grouped by a machine learning-based computer-aided system. In addition to extracting radiomic features on both low-energy (LE) and recombined (RC) images from the calcification areas, the peri-calcification regions, which is generated by extending the annotation margin radially with gradients from 1 mm to 9 mm, were attempted. Machine learning (ML) models were built to classify calcifications into malignant and benign groups. The diagnostic matrices were also evaluated by combing ML models with subjective reading.

Results: Models for LE (significant features: wavelet-LLL_glcm_Imc2_MLO; wavelet-HLL_firstorder_Entropy_MLO; wavelet-LHH_glcm_DifferenceVariance_CC; wavelet-HLL_glcm_SumEntropy_MLO;wavelet-HLH_glrlm_ShortRunLowGray LevelEmphasis_MLO; original_firstorder_Entropy_MLO; original_shape_Elongation_MLO) and RC (significant features: wavelet-HLH_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized_MLO; wavelet-LLH_firstorder_10Percentile_CC; original_firstorder_Maximum_MLO; wavelet-HHH_glcm_Autocorrelation_MLO; original_shape_Elongation_MLO; wavelet-LHL_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized_MLO; wavelet-LLH_firstorder_RootMeanSquared_MLO) images were set up with 7 features. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of RC models are significantly better than those of LE models with compact and expanded boundary (RC v.s. LE, compact: 0.81 v.s. 0.73, p < 0.05; expanded: 0.89 v.s. 0.81, p < 0.05) and RC models with 3 mm boundary extension yielded the best performance compared to those with other sizes (AUC = 0.89). Combining with radiologists' reading, the 3mm-boundary RC model achieved a sensitivity of 0.871 and negative predictive value of 0.937 with similar accuracy of 0.843 in predicting malignancy.

Conclusions: The machine learning model integrating intra- and peri-calcification regions on CEM has the potential to aid radiologists' performance in predicting malignancy of suspicious breast calcifications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/XST-230332DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

calcification-only lesions
8
peri-calcification regions
8
models
5
peri-lesion regions
4
regions differentiating
4
differentiating suspicious
4
suspicious breast
4
breast calcification-only
4
lesions contrast
4
contrast enhanced
4

Similar Publications

Malignancy risk stratification prediction of BI-RADS 4B calcifications based on contrast-enhanced mammographic features: a multicenter study.

Breast Cancer Res Treat

November 2024

Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Haidian District, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Beijing, China.

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates factors affecting the risk of malignancy in BI-RADS 4B calcification-only lesions found through Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) and aims to create a predictive model for assessing this risk
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Peri-lesion regions in differentiating suspicious breast calcification-only lesions specifically on contrast enhanced mammography.

J Xray Sci Technol

May 2024

Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China.

Purpose: The explore the added value of peri-calcification regions on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as only calcification on routine mammogram.

Methods: Patients who underwent CEM because of suspicious calcification-only lesions were included. The test set included patients between March 2017 and March 2019, while the validation set was collected between April 2019 and October 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rationale And Objectives: Little is known about the factors affecting the Artificial Intelligence (AI) software performance on mammography for breast cancer detection. This study was to identify factors associated with abnormality scores assigned by the AI software.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective database search was conducted to identify consecutive asymptomatic women who underwent breast cancer surgery between April 2016 and December 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Anatomic details affecting the adverse outcomes following carotid artery stenting have not been well characterized. We compared in-hospital outcomes following transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients stratified by degree of lesion calcification and aortic arch type.

Methods: Data from patients in the Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Quality Initiative database undergoing TCAR (January 2017 to April 2020) or TFCAS (May 2005 to April 2020) and had non-missing grading on carotid artery calcification or aortic arch type was analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of radiation dose between 2D digital stereotactic versus digital breast tomosynthesis-guided breast biopsies.

Eur J Radiol

January 2021

Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, United States. Electronic address:

Rationale And Objective: Use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast imaging has necessitated DBT-guided biopsy, however, a single DBT acquisition may result in a greater radiation dose than a single DM acquisition. Our objective was to compare the number of images acquired and the resulting radiation dose of DBT versus DM-guided breast biopsies.

Method: All biopsies performed on our DM unit from 8/2016 to 1/2017 and on our DM-DBT unit from 8/2017 to 1/2018 were retrospectively reviewed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!