People often feel mixed and conflicting feelings (i.e., ambivalence) toward their romantic partner. So far, research has primarily shown that ambivalence is linked to negative outcomes in relationships, but is this always true? Building off the affect, behavior, cognition model of ambivalence, the present work tests the idea that, when ambivalent, individuals can experience both positive and negative cognitive and behavioral responses toward their partner. This idea was tested in three different studies with people in romantic relationships: a cross-sectional international study ( = 665), a 10-day daily diary study ( = 171), and a 12-day daily diary study with two follow-ups ( = 176 couples and nine individuals). Across studies, when people experienced greater subjective ambivalence (i.e., explicitly reported feeling mixed and conflicted) toward their partner, they spent more time thinking about the difficulties they faced in their relationship but also about ways in which they can make it better and, in turn, engaged in both constructive (e.g., wanting to spend more time with the partner) and destructive (e.g., ignoring or criticizing the partner) behaviors toward their partner. Ambivalence was also associated with greater fluctuations in both constructive and destructive behaviors daily and over time. This work advances the current knowledge about ambivalence in romantic relationships and further demonstrates that individuals can experience both positive and negative cognitions and behaviors toward a partner when ambivalent. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0001340DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ambivalence romantic
12
romantic relationships
12
partner ambivalence
8
individuals experience
8
experience positive
8
positive negative
8
studies people
8
daily diary
8
diary study
8
behaviors partner
8

Similar Publications

Ambivalence (i.e., "mixed feelings") is a common and consequential experience in romantic relationships, but not much is known about which aspects of relationships are likely to elicit it.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Charles Darwin navigated a tension between two philosophical viewpoints: the mechanistic view that excludes agency from nature and the organicist perspective that connects agency to life itself.
  • His internal conflict stemmed from the different intellectual legacies he inherited, making him grapple with the implications of both views.
  • This struggle resulted in a dynamic and productive approach to his work, allowing Darwin to explore the complexities of nature and life more deeply.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Both Hostile and Benevolent Sexism Predict Men's Infidelity.

J Sex Res

April 2024

Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University.

Infidelity has destructive effects on romantic relationships. Several idiographic characteristics or experiences in an intimate relationship have been linked to unfaithfulness. Yet, relatively little research has been paid to investigate how sexist beliefs might sabotage relationships by incurring infidelity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Romantic attachment is reflected in various aspects of dyadic interaction in a couple, since it is a self-reinforcing system of cognitive, emotional and behavioral patterns. Romantic jealousy was shown to be associated with dimensions of attachment insecurity in various studies worldwide.

Objectives: To identify differences in expressions of romantic jealousy based on romantic attachment style.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!