AI Article Synopsis

  • Accurate assessment of flow status is vital for patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS), but the role of 3D transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) in this assessment is not fully understood.
  • The study involved reviewing patients from 2019 to 2022, categorizing them into low-flow/low-gradient (LF-LG) and normal-flow/low-gradient (NF-LG) groups based on echocardiography, and analyzing differences in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry.
  • Results showed that LF-LG patients had a significantly higher LVOT ellipticity index, indicating a greater mismatch in flow status classification compared to NF-LG patients; thus, 3DTEE-derived

Article Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of flow status is crucial in low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS). However, the clinical implication of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) on flow status evaluation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the assessment of flow status using 3D TEE in low-gradient AS patients.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with low-gradient AS and preserved ejection fraction at our institution between 2019 and 2022. Patients were categorized into low-flow/low-gradient (LF-LG) AS or normal-flow/low-gradient (NF-LG) AS based on two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2DTTE). We compared the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry between the two groups and reclassified them using stroke volume index (SVi) obtained by 3DTEE.

Results: Among 173 patients (105 with LF-LG AS and 68 with NF-LG AS), 54 propensity-matched pairs of patients were analyzed. 3DTEE-derived ellipticity index of LVOT was significantly higher in LF-LG AS patients compared to NF-LG AS patients (p = 0.012). We assessed the discordance in flow status classification between SVi and SVi in both groups using a cutoff value of 35 ml/m. The LF-LG AS group exhibited a significantly higher discordance rate compared to the NF-LG AS group, with rates of 50% and 2%, respectively. The optimal cutoff values of SVi for identifying low flow status, based on 2DTTE-derived cutoff values, were determined to be 43 ml/m.

Conclusions: LVOT ellipticity in low-gradient AS patients varies depending on flow status, and this difference contributes to discrepancies between SVi and SVi, particularly in LF-LG AS patients. Utilizing SVi is valuable for accurately assessing flow status.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12574-023-00638-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flow status
28
stroke volume
8
three-dimensional transesophageal
8
transesophageal echocardiography
8
low-gradient aortic
8
aortic stenosis
8
assessment flow
8
patients
8
lf-lg patients
8
compared nf-lg
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!