AI Article Synopsis

  • Longitudinal risk factor levels and patterns may provide better insights into atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk than single, cross-sectional measures used in current clinical assessments.
  • The study compared the traditional Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) with a deep learning model called Dynamic-DeepHit, analyzing data from over 15,000 participants over 8 years to assess the effectiveness of each model in predicting ASCVD risk.
  • Results showed that the deep learning model outperformed the PCE in terms of both prediction accuracy (AUROC score) and reliability (Brier score), suggesting that incorporating longitudinal data can enhance ASCVD risk prediction.

Article Abstract

It is increasingly clear that longitudinal risk factor levels and trajectories are related to risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) above and beyond single measures. Currently used in clinical care, the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) are based on regression methods that predict ASCVD risk based on cross-sectional risk factor levels. Deep learning (DL) models have been developed to incorporate longitudinal data for risk prediction but its benefit for ASCVD risk prediction relative to the traditional Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) remain unknown. Our study included 15,565 participants from four cardiovascular disease cohorts free of baseline ASCVD who were followed for adjudicated ASCVD. Ten-year ASCVD risk was calculated in the training set using our benchmark, the PCE, and a longitudinal DL model, Dynamic-DeepHit. Predictors included those incorporated in the PCE: sex, race, age, total cholesterol, high density lipid cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, diabetes, hypertension treatment and smoking. The discrimination and calibration performance of the two models were evaluated in an overall hold-out testing dataset. Of the 15,565 participants in our dataset, 2170 (13.9%) developed ASCVD. The performance of the longitudinal DL model that incorporated 8 years of longitudinal risk factor data improved upon that of the PCE [AUROC: 0.815 (CI 0.782-0.844) vs 0.792 (CI 0.760-0.825)] and the net reclassification index was 0.385. The brier score for the DL model was 0.0514 compared with 0.0542 in the PCE. Incorporating longitudinal risk factors in ASCVD risk prediction using DL can improve model discrimination and calibration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10830564PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51685-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk prediction
16
ascvd risk
16
risk
12
cardiovascular disease
12
longitudinal risk
12
risk factor
12
incorporating longitudinal
8
risk factors
8
atherosclerotic cardiovascular
8
deep learning
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!