Objective: The aim: The purpose of the article is to analyze the ways of solving the problem of revision hip joint replacement. The article discusses the methods of treatment using a custom triflange acetabular component.

Patients And Methods: Materials and methods: The analysis of 37 literary sources includes a discussion of the features of the use of individual triflange acetabular components and errors in revision hip arthroplasty, which are associated with various factors.

Conclusion: Conclusions: A review of studies devoted to the use of custom triflange acetabular components confirms the effectiveness in the early postoperative period in the treatment of critical acetabular defects and pelvic ring discontinuity. The CTAC use is particularly relevant in case of the pelvic ring disintegration, as it provides for the appropriate endoprosthesis adaptation with the healthy bone, as well as for the bone defects plastics and recovery of the hip joint biome¬chanics. So, the use of individual constructions is indicated for the patients with significant bone mass loss, where augment adaptation and adjustment is impossible. This method is used more often when there is no other alternative. Research results showed a trend that special three-flange components of the acetabulum have better long-term results compared to traditional standard components for large bone defects. Improving production and increasing the number of CTACs should reduce their cost. In summary, the custom triflange acetabulum components provide a personalized secure fit that can reduce the risk of complications and improve patient outcomes. In summary, the triple-flange acetabulum components provide a personalized secure fit that can reduce the risk of complications and improve patient outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.36740/WLek202312120DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

custom triflange
16
triflange acetabular
16
hip joint
12
joint replacement
8
revision hip
8
acetabular components
8
pelvic ring
8
bone defects
8
acetabulum components
8
components provide
8

Similar Publications

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res

November 2024

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma, Pierre Paul Riquet University Hospital, Toulouse, France. Electronic address:

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are a major challenge in orthopedics. Proper recognition of these complex cases helps to identify and treat patients with different presentations. These fractures can occur intraoperatively and be treated immediately, or they can occur postoperatively, following trauma or in the context of chronic low bone quality or associated implant loosening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Custom-made partial pelvis replacements (PPRs) are increasingly used in the reconstruction of large acetabular defects and have mainly been designed using a triflange approach, requiring extensive soft-tissue dissection. The monoflange design, where primary intramedullary fixation within the ilium combined with a monoflange for rotational stability, was anticipated to overcome this obstacle. The aim of this study was to evaluate the design with regard to functional outcome, complications, and acetabular reconstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the accuracy of porous custom-made triflange acetabular implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA) by comparing actual postoperative outcomes with preoperative planning data through CT scans.
  • It aims to determine whether the volume of bone that must be resected affects the accuracy of implant placement and how these factors influence patient function, complications, and overall implant survival.
  • Results show a mean deviation in implant orientation and center of rotation (COR) restoration, with only 45% of the cases achieving optimal positioning, indicating challenges in maintaining accuracy during surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[The reconstruction techniques and mid-term clinical outcomes of hip revision for acetabular bone defect after total hip arthroplasty].

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi

September 2024

Senior Department of Orthopaedics, the Forth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing 100048, China.

Article Synopsis
  • The study analyzes three different reconstruction methods for hip revision surgeries in patients with acetabular bone defects following total hip arthroplasty (THA), focusing on mid-term clinical outcomes.
  • It involves a total of 109 patients categorized into three groups based on the surgical technique used: normal cup, augment, and triflange, with varying patient demographics and methods.
  • Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted over time, measuring factors like leg length discrepancy and hip function, with comparisons made before and after surgery to assess effectiveness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!