AI Article Synopsis

  • Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic outcomes for diabetes patients, but adherence levels and their impact on outcomes are not fully understood.
  • A study analyzed data from 7,669 individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who started using either intermittent scanned (isCGM) or real-time CGM (rtCGM) over 12 months.
  • Results showed that rtCGM users had significantly higher adherence rates and better A1C reductions compared to isCGM users, indicating that commitment to CGM usage is crucial for managing blood sugar levels effectively.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems by people with diabetes is associated with improved glycemic outcomes, including lower glycated hemoglobin (A1C). Less is known about adherence to CGM systems, whether glycemic outcomes are impacted by levels of adherence, or whether adherence rates differ between types of CGM systems-intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) or real-time CGM (rtCGM).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of de-identified US administrative health claims and linked laboratory data was conducted using the Merative™ MarketScan Research Database. The cohort included CGM-naïve people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes treated with intensive insulin therapy (T2D-IIT) who initiated rtCGM or isCGM between August 1, 2019 and March 31, 2021 (defined as the index date). Adherence was calculated over a 12-month period using the proportion of days covered (PDC) with PDC ≥ 0.8 defined as adherent. A1C values were obtained within 6 months of the index date.

Results: A total of 7669 individuals were identified. Subgroups included T1D using isCGM (n = 1578), T1D using rtCGM (n = 1244), T2D-IIT using isCGM (n = 3567), and T2D-IIT using rtCGM (n = 1280). After 12 months, PDC was 0.71 (0.30)-0.72 (0.31) (mean(SD)) for T1D and T2D-IIT rtCGM users and 0.55 (0.34)-0.56 (0.34) for T1D and T2D-IIT isCGM users. The proportion of adherent users (PDC ≥ 0.8) was 56.8-59.7% for rtCGM users and 36.3-37.6% for isCGM users. Overall, regardless of diabetes type, the odds of adherence were over two times higher for rtCGM users compared to isCGM users. For those with available A1C information (T1D n = 213; T2D-IIT n = 346), independent of CGM type, adherence to CGM was associated with a greater reduction in A1C and more people reaching A1C targets of < 7.0% or < 8.0%.

Conclusion: For people with T1D or T2D-IIT, higher adherence to CGM is associated with greater reductions in A1C, and higher adherence rates were observed with rtCGM systems than with isCGM systems.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10942933PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-023-01529-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rtcgm users
12
iscgm users
12
continuous glucose
8
glucose monitoring
8
people type 1
8
type 1 diabetes
8
type 2 diabetes
8
diabetes treated
8
treated intensive
8
intensive insulin
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Management of advanced type 2 diabetes (T2D) typically involves daily insulin therapy alongside frequent blood glucose monitoring, as treatments such as oral antidiabetic agents are therapeutically insufficient. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) has been shown to facilitate greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and improvements in patient satisfaction relative to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). This study aimed to investigate the cost-utility of rt-CGM versus SMBG in Spanish patients with insulin-treated T2D.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinical perspective on innovative insulin delivery technologies in diabetes management.

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)

October 2024

Department of Health Economics and Outcome Research, ECONiX Research, Samsun, Türkiye.

Introduction: The primary objective of this study is to report the results of an online questionnaire and the in-person discussion sessions of physicians specializing in diabetes care in which their opinions about current diabetes management was obtained.

Methods: The Diabetes Innovation Summit 2023 drew attendance from a diverse group of specialized physicians from multiple countries. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to examine the technologies and medical needs associated with diabetes management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Integrating mobile health (mHealth) apps into daily diabetes management allows users to monitor and track their health data, creating a comprehensive system for managing daily diabetes activities and generating valuable real-world data. This analysis investigates the impact of transitioning from traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) to real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM), alongside the use of a mHealth app, on users' glycemic control. Data were collected from 1271 diabetes type 1 and type 2 users of the mySugr app who made a minimum of 50 SMBG logs 1 month before transitioning to rtCGM and then used rtCGM for at least 6 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Some people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) require intensive insulin therapy to manage their diabetes. This can increase the risk of diabetes-related hospitalizations. We hypothesize that initiation of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM), which continuously measures a user's glucose values and provides threshold- and trend-based alerts, will reduce diabetes-related emergency department (ED) and inpatient hospitalizations and concomitant costs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In Spain, from October 10th, 2023, the FreeStyle Libre 2 system offers the possibility to automatically changed from isCGM to rtCGM with a system update. Our study aimed to evaluate the glucometric before and after that date. We didn't find significant changes in TIR, however time of use increased and TBR decreased.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!