A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Fracture-related infection in revision proximal femoral intramedullary nails. | LitMetric

Fracture-related infection in revision proximal femoral intramedullary nails.

Injury

Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, UK.

Published: March 2024

Background: The proximal femoral nail is a commonly used fixation device for extra-capsular neck of femur fractures at our UK NHS Trust. Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a catastrophic complication that can be associated with internal fixation. FRI is often diagnosed late, and causes significant impact on the patient and healthcare system, leading to extended hospital stays, reduced quality of life, high healthcare costs and increased mortality and morbidity.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate whether failed proximal femoral nails treated at a major trauma centre in the United Kingdom are undergoing routine intraoperative microbiology sampling, as outlined by the FRI Consensus Group in 2020, and also to establish how often fracture-related infection is present in failed proximal femoral nails.

Method: Electronic patient record systems were reviewed over a 4-year period between 2018-2022 to identify patients who had a proximal femoral nailing, and those who required revision surgery. From this cohort, we then identified whether sampling had taken place during revision surgery, and the number of samples taken.

Results: 1041 proximal femoral nails were performed at our trust during the 4-year period. 60 of these implants failed, with 52 of these undergoing revision surgery at our hospital.  Only 56% cases had intra-operative samples taken for microbiology testing, with an average of 9 samples sent per case. Intra-operative sampling confirmed infection in 25% of cases with samples sent.  Of the cases requiring ≥ 3 operations, 75% of cases had confirmed infection.

Discussion: The data shows that more can be done to ensure earlier diagnosis of fracture-related infection in failed proximal femoral nails. We should have a high suspicion of FRI in this cohort of patients. This study highlights the importance of a standardised protocol to ensure routine intra-operative sampling during proximal femoral nail revision surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111338DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

proximal femoral
32
fracture-related infection
16
revision surgery
16
failed proximal
12
femoral nails
12
proximal
8
femoral
8
femoral nail
8
infection failed
8
4-year period
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!