Study Design: Retrospective review.

Objective: Assess the feasibility of saphenous nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SN-SSEP) monitoring in lumbar spine surgeries.

Background Context: SN-SSEPs have been proposed for detecting lumbar plexus and femoral nerve injury during lateral lumbar surgery where tibial nerve (TN) SSEPs alone are insufficient. SN-SSEPs may also be useful in other types of lumbar surgery, as stimulation of SN below the knee derives solely from the L4 root and provides a means of L4 monitoring, whereas TN-SSEPs often do not detect single nerve root injury. The feasibility of routine SN-SSEP monitoring has not been established.

Methods: A total of 563 consecutive cases using both TN-SSEP and SN-SSEP monitoring were included. Anesthesia was at the discretion of the anesthesiologist, using an inhalant in 97.7% of procedures. SN stimulation was performed using 13 mm needle electrodes placed below the knee using 200-400 μsec pulses at 15 to 100 mA. Adjustments to stimulation parameters were made by the neurophysiology technician while obtaining baselines. Data were graded retrospectively for monitorability and cortical response amplitudes were measured by two independent reviewers.

Results: Ninety-eight percent of TN-SSEPs and 92.5% of SN-SSEPs were monitorable at baseline, with a mean response amplitude of 1.35 μV for TN-SSEPs and 0.71 μV for SN-SSEPs. A significant difference between the stimulation parameters used to obtain reproducible TN and SN-SSEPs at baseline was observed, with SN-SSEPs requiring greater stimulation intensities. Body mass index is not associated with baseline monitorability. Out of 20 signal changes observed, 11 involved SN, while TN-SSEPs were unaffected.

Conclusion: With adjustments to stimulation parameters, SN-SSEP monitoring is feasible within a large clinical cohort without modifications to the anesthetic plan. Incorporating SN into standard intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring protocols for lumbar spine procedures may expand the role of SSEP monitoring to include detecting injury to the lumbar plexus.

Level Of Evidence: 3.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004938DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sn-ssep monitoring
16
lumbar spine
12
stimulation parameters
12
feasibility saphenous
8
saphenous nerve
8
monitoring
8
monitoring lumbar
8
lumbar surgery
8
adjustments stimulation
8
lumbar
7

Similar Publications

Study Design: Retrospective review.

Objective: Assess the feasibility of saphenous nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SN-SSEP) monitoring in lumbar spine surgeries.

Background Context: SN-SSEPs have been proposed for detecting lumbar plexus and femoral nerve injury during lateral lumbar surgery where tibial nerve (TN) SSEPs alone are insufficient.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures are performed with multimodality neuromonitoring of the femoral nerve to prevent lumbosacral plexus and peripheral nerve injury from positioning, dilation, retraction, and hardware implantation. The integrity of the femoral nerve can be continuously assessed during these procedures by Somatosensory Evoked Potentials of the Saphenous nerve (Sn-SSEPs). Sn-SSEPs are technically challenging to acquire and necessitate advanced troubleshooting skills with a more rigid anesthetic regimen and physiological parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Monitoring superficial peroneal nerve somatosensory evoked potential during L4-5 lumbar root decompression.

Spine J

August 2013

Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Bloomsburg University, 400 East Second Street, Bloomsburg, PA 17815, USA.

Background Context: Posttibial nerve somatosensory evoked potential (PTN-SSEP) often fails to detect individual nerve root dysfunction, whereas dermatomal somatosensory evoked potential (DSSEP) can be difficult to obtain in anesthetized patients.

Purpose: The main aim of this study is to investigate whether the superficial peroneal nerve SSEP (SPN-SSEP), a cutaneous nerve SSEP derived from L4-5 roots, can be relied on as an intraoperative neurophysiological assessment for L4-5 roots.

Study Design/setting: Retrospective review of consecutive case series.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!