Prostate cancer is unique compared to other major cancers due to the presence of multiple primary malignant foci in the majority of patients at the time of diagnosis. Each malignant focus has distinct somatic mutations and gene expression patterns, which represents a challenge for the development of prognostic tests for localized prostate cancer. Additionally, the molecular heterogeneity of advanced prostate cancer has important implications for management, particularly for patients with metastatic and locally recurrent cancer. Studies have shown that prostate cancers with mutations in DNA damage response genes are more sensitive to drugs inhibiting the poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) enzyme. However, testing for such mutations should consider both spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Here, we summarize studies where multiregional genomics and transcriptomics analyses have been performed for primary prostate cancer. We further discuss the vast interfocal heterogeneity and how prognostic biomarkers and a molecular definition of the index tumor should be developed. The concept of focal treatments in prostate cancer has been evolving as a demand from patients and clinicians and is one example where there is a need for defining an index tumor. Here, biomarkers must have proven value for individual malignant foci. The potential discovery and implementation of biomarkers that are agnostic to heterogeneity are also explored as an alternative to multisample testing. Thus, deciding upon whole-organ treatment, such as radical prostatectomy, should depend on information from biomarkers which are informative for the whole organ.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189080 | DOI Listing |
Histopathology
January 2025
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Aims: Classification and risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) has transitioned from histopathological features to molecular classification, e.g. the ProMisE classifier, identifying four prognostic subtypes: POLE mutant (POLEmut) with almost no recurrence or disease-specific death events, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP), with intermediate outcome and p53 abnormal (p53abn) with poor outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIowa Orthop J
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Background: There is a currently limited data regarding cancer risk in Orthopaedic Surgeons. This study summarizes a survey on cancer prevalence in orthopaedic surgeons.
Methods: A cancer prevalence survey was emailed to all 23,370 members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).
Eur Urol Open Sci
January 2025
Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is strongly recommended by current clinical guidelines for improved detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). However, the major limitations are the need for intravenous (IV) contrast and dependence on reader expertise. Efforts to address these issues include use of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and advanced, quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc
January 2025
Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Biostatistics Branch, Rockville, USA.
Accurate cancer risk estimation is crucial to clinical decision-making, such as identifying high-risk people for screening. However, most existing cancer risk models incorporate data from epidemiologic studies, which usually cannot represent the target population. While population-based health surveys are ideal for making inference to the target population, they typically do not collect time-to-cancer incidence data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFContemp Clin Trials Commun
February 2025
Healthcare Delivery Research, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Background: Black individuals with cancer have a higher prevalence of comorbidities and a worse cancer prognosis than other racial groups in the US. As part of a quality improvement project, we aimed to demonstrate feasibility of self-monitoring and community health worker (CHW) support among managing comorbidities for Black individuals with breast or prostate cancer.
Methods: In a single arm, pre-post study, we enrolled patients with diabetes and/or hypertension who identified as Black and were diagnosed with 1) stage 0-IV breast cancer, or 2) prostate cancer and on long-term androgen-deprivation therapy.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!