Objectives: Use of telehealth has been on the rise since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although there has been much investigation of telehealth use in the context of replacing in-person visits, there has been limited study of patients' motivations for using telehealth. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate patient characteristics associated with telehealth use and (2) evaluate patients' motivations for using telehealth.
Study Design: We conducted a cross-sectional secondary data analysis of the 2022 nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey.
Methods: We conducted logistic regression models estimating the relationship between demographic and health characteristics and (1) use of telehealth services in the previous 12 months and (2) each of 5 motivations for using telehealth among telehealth users.
Results: The most common reason for using telehealth was recommendation or requirement by a clinician (73.6%). Respondents with depression were more likely to use telehealth than those without depression (OR, 2.73; P < .001) and were more likely to be motivated by convenience (OR, 1.80; P < .01), and Hispanic respondents were more likely to use telehealth to avoid exposure to infection (OR, 1.58; P < .05).
Conclusions: Identifying patients' motivations may help decision makers better understand the perceived value of telehealth among patients and may help policy makers and administrators create opportunities for increased patient choice around visit modality to maximize health care access, value, and quality. Consideration of patient motivations for telehealth use may support practitioners in making tailored and person-centered decisions when recommending telehealth vs in-person visits.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89486 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Res Protoc
January 2025
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Participatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Background: Digital health interventions have become increasingly popular in recent years, expanding the possibilities for treatment for various patient groups. In clinical research, while the design of the intervention receives close attention, challenges with research participant engagement and retention persist. This may be partially due to the use of digital health platforms, which may lack adequacy for participants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Internet Res
January 2025
Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Background: Virtual follow-up (VFU) has the potential to enhance cancer survivorship care. However, a greater understanding is needed of how VFU can be optimized.
Objective: This study aims to examine how, for whom, and in what contexts VFU works for cancer survivorship care.
PLoS One
January 2025
School of Public Health, Institute of Health, Bule Hora University, Bule Hora, Ethiopia.
Background: Despite the immense potential of telemedicine, its implementation in Ethiopia and other developing nations has faced formidable challenges, leading to disappointingly low utilization rates. Therefore, this study sought to assess the magnitude and factors associated with telemedicine service practice among healthcare professionals in the pilot public hospitals of Sidama and Southern Nations Nationalities Peoples Regions.
Methods: Cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1-30, 2021 among randomly selected 407 health professionals working at Pilot Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia.
Brain Impair
January 2025
Department of Research and Innovation, Institut Guttmann - Hospital de Neurorehabilitació, Institut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació adscrit a la UAB, Cami Can Ruti s/n, 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain; and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain; and Fundació Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Background Stroke now represents the condition with the highest need for physical rehabilitation worldwide, with only low or moderate-level evidence testing telerehabilitation compared to in-person care. We compared functional ambulation in subacute patients with stroke following telerehabilitation and matched in-person controls with no biopsychosocial differences at baseline. Methods We conducted a matched case-control study to compare functional ambulation between individuals with stroke following telerehabilitation and in-person rehabilitation, assessed using the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) and the Functional Independence Measure™ (FIM).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Internet Res
January 2025
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Background: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic precipitated a rapid shift to virtual care in health care settings, inclusive of mental health care. Understanding clients' perspectives on virtual mental health care quality will be critical to informing future policies and practices.
Objective: This study aimed to outline the process of redesigning and validating the Virtual Client Experience Survey (VCES), which can be used to evaluate client and family experiences of virtual care, specifically virtual mental health and addiction care.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!