Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A radiology report is prepared for communicating clinical information about observed abnormal structures and clinically important findings with referring clinicians. However, such observations and findings are often accompanied by ambiguous expressions, which can prevent clinicians from accurately interpreting the content of reports. To systematically assess the degree of diagnostic certainty for each observation and finding in a report, we defined an ordinal scale comprising five classes: definite, likely, may represent, unlikely, and denial. Furthermore, we applied a deep learning classification model to determine its applicability to in-house radiology reports. We trained and evaluated the model using 540 in-house chest computed tomography reports. The deep learning model achieved a micro F1-score of 97.61%, which indicated that our ordinal scale was suitable for measuring the diagnostic certainty of observations and findings in a report.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SHTI231029 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!