Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Study Design: prospective multicenter study.
Objectives: Active apex correction (APC) is posterior tethering technique for correction of early onset scoliosis (EOS) via reverse modulation at the apex. Active apex correction has been increasingly used worldwide. This study aimed to assess short-term outcomes of multicenter study with ≥2 years of APC on spine length, curve correction, complications, unplanned surgeries, and proposed low crankshaft phenomena incidence.
Methods: Prospective multicenter study including 24 EOS patients treated by APC; involves inserting and compressing pedicle screws on convex side of apex proximal and distal to most wedged vertebra allowing apex modulation according to Hueter-Volkmann law. Excluded patients with <2 years follow-up whom APC was not primary surgery.
Results: Mean age 85.97 ± 32.43 months, 71% congenital scoliosis, mean follow-up 35.54 ± 12.36 months. At final follow-up, statistically significant improvement in Cobbs angle (∆ = 23.96%, < .0001), spinal length T1-T12 (∆ = 12.83%, < .0001), T1-L5 (∆ = 13.41%, < .0001) but not in apical vertebral translation (AVT) albeit clinical improvement (∆ = 7.9%, = .36) compared to preoperative measurements. Comparing immediate postoperative measurements to >2 years follow-up, statistically significant improvement in spinal length T1-T12 (∆ = 6.03%, = .0002) and T1-L5 (∆ = 6.26%, < .0001) but not in Cobbs angle (∆ = 4.93%, = .3) or AVT (∆ = 14.77%, = .25). 9 complications requiring 3 unplanned surgeries recorded in all patients including 2 broken rods, 2 adding-on and 4 screw dislodgement.
Conclusion: Active apex correction is a novel technique that has been incorporated in several countries as treatment modality for EOS. Short-term outcomes are promising in terms of clinical improvement, complication rates and decreased need for multiple operations or unplanned surgeries.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571920 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682241229677 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!