Background: The cytomegalovirus (CMV) mismatch rate in deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients in the US remains above 40%. Since CMV mismatching is common in DDKT recipients, the cumulative effects may be significant in the context of overall patient and graft survival. Our primary objective was to describe the short- and long-term risks associated with high-risk CMV donor positive/recipient negative (D+/R-) mismatching among DDKT recipients with the explicit goal of deriving a mathematical mismatching penalty.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, secondary analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database using donor-matched DDKT recipient pairs (N=105,608) transplanted between 2011-2022. All-cause mortality and graft failure hazard ratios were calculated from one year to ten years post-DDKT. All-cause graft failure included death events. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimation at 10 years post-DDKT and extrapolated to 20 years to provide the average graft days lost (aGDL) and average patient days lost (aPDL) due to CMV D+/R- serostatus mismatching. We also performed an age-based stratification analysis to compare the relative risk of CMV D+ mismatching by age.
Results: Among 31,518 CMV D+/R- recipients, at 1 year post-DDKT, the relative risk of death increased by 29% (p<0.001), and graft failure increased by 17% (p<0.001) as compared to matched CMV D+/R+ group (N=31,518). Age stratification demonstrated a significant increase in the risk associated with CMV mismatching in patients 40 years of age and greater. The aGDL per patient due to mismatching was 125 days and the aPDL per patient was 100 days.
Conclusion: The risks of CMV D+/R- mismatching are seen both at 1 year post-DDKT period and accumulated throughout the lifespan of the patient, with the average CMV D+/R- recipient losing more than three months of post-DDKT survival time. CMV D+/R- mismatching poses a more significant risk and a greater health burden than previously reported, thus obviating the need for better preventive strategies including CMV serodirected organ allocation to prolong lifespans and graft survival in high-risk patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803440 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1292648 | DOI Listing |
Pediatr Transplant
February 2025
Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Purpose: In kidney transplantation (KT), delayed graft function (DGF) is associated with worse outcomes. However, it is unclear what effect DGF plays in long-term survival compared to the impact of the various transplant, donor, and recipient risk factors associated with DGF. This study aims to determine the effect of DGF alone on long-term survival in pediatric deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (DDKTRs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
November 2024
Transplant Nephrology, PPG Health, Fort Worth, USA.
Background A2/A2B to B kidney transplantation has the potential to increase transplant access for traditionally disadvantaged blood group B minority candidates. Despite prior reports of positive post-transplant safety and clinical success, A2/A2B to B kidney transplantation remains underutilized in the United States. This study aims to investigate the post-transplant outcomes of A2/A2B to B kidney transplants performed at our center.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransplantation
August 2024
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Background: We aimed to assess contemporary transplant outcomes among kidney recipients with amyloidosis, as the treatment and prognosis of amyloidosis have shown improvement over time.
Methods: Using the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, we initially evaluated the changes in patient and graft survival among kidney recipients with amyloidosis from 2002 to 2021. We then compared transplant outcomes between recipients with amyloidosis versus those with diabetic and nondiabetic causes of kidney failure, creating 1:4 matches with highly similar characteristics separately for deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) and living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) during the last decade (2012-2021).
Clin Transplant
July 2024
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Introduction: Outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients from the same donor with donor-recipient sex discordance have been studied with inconsistent results.
Methods: Adult DDKT where both kidneys from the same donor occurred at our center in two different recipients of different sexes were included. Outcomes were analyzed separately for male and female donors, based on the concordance or discordance between donor-recipient sex: Male-male (M-m) versus Male to female (M-f) or vice versa, F-f versus F-m.
Transplant Proc
August 2024
Department of Internal Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, South Korea. Electronic address:
Introduction: The widely employed Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) scoring system, designed for assessing deceased donors (DD), plays a pivotal role in predicting graft function post kidney transplantation (KT). Given the dynamic nature of renal function, including serum creatinine (sCr), in managing DDs, it remains uncertain optimal timing to use KDPI for assessing postoperative graft function.
Methods: In this retrospective review, we assessed 246 DDs who were managed within a donor management program from January 2010 to December 2021.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!