AI Article Synopsis

  • Endovascular thrombectomy is a common treatment for acute ischemic stroke but poses radiation risks to patients and medical staff.
  • A high frames per second unmasked CINE protocol was tested against the traditional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for its efficacy in reducing radiation exposure during the procedure.
  • Results from a study involving 131 patients showed that the CINE protocol significantly lowered radiation exposure without negatively impacting safety or clinical outcomes, suggesting it could be a safer alternative in thrombectomy procedures.

Article Abstract

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy has become a standard procedure for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. Radiation exposure to the patient and operators during mechanical thrombectomy procedures is a concern.

Methods: The use of a high frames per second unmasked protocol-cineangiography (CINE)-derived from cardiac intervention could mitigate radiation exposure without sacrificing procedural and clinical outcomes.

Results: The analysis of a prospective-maintained monocentric database of 131 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (65 with the CINE protocol and 66 with the conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) protocol) showed a significant reduction in radiation exposure for both air kerma (AK) and dose-area product (DAP) indicators (AK 463.7 mGy vs 772 mGy, P<0.01; DAP 41.35 Gy/cm CINE vs 83.77 Gy/cm DSA, P<0.01), with no differences regarding both safety and efficacy outcomes (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b 78.4% CINE and 81.5% DSA, P=0.79; overall complications rate both intracranial and extracranial 23% CINE and 19.6% DSA, P=0.65). There were no significant differences in post-thrombectomy radiographic hemorrhagic conversion rate (P=0.77) or functional independence on discharge defined as modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (P=0.39). A post-hoc image assessment of vessel point occlusion and recanalization mTICI score performed by three experienced interventional neuroradiologists not involved in the procedure showed a non-significant difference between the two groups regarding occlusion point (0.928 vs 0.953, P=0.31) and recanalization grade (0.814 vs 0.847, P=0.62).

Conclusions: Our initial experience demonstrated that reduction of the quality of CINE images caused no modifications in safety and efficacy and should fit within the context of diagnostic requests in an intracranial revascularization procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-021289DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiation exposure
16
mechanical thrombectomy
12
digital subtraction
8
subtraction angiography
8
exposure sacrificing
8
cineangiography versus
4
versus standard
4
standard digital
4
angiography mechanical
4
thrombectomy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!