Distinguishing cardiac catheter ablation energy modalities by applying natural language processing to electronic health records.

Catheter ablation is used to treat symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and is performed using either cryoballoon (CB) or radiofrequency (RF) ablation. There is limited real world data of CB and RF in the US as healthcare codes are agnostic of energy modality. An alternative method is to analyze patients' electronic health records (EHRs) using Optum's EHR database. To determine the feasibility of using patients' EHRs with natural language processing (NLP) to distinguish CB versus RF ablation procedures. Optum de-identified EHR dataset, Optum Cardiac Ablation NLP Table. This was a retrospective analysis of existing de-identified EHR data. Medical codes were used to create an ablation validation table. Frequency analysis was used to assess ablation procedures and their associated note terms. Two cohorts were created (1) index procedures, (2) multiple procedures. Possible note term combinations included (1) cryoablation (2) radiofrequency (3) ablation, or (4) both. Of the 40,810 validated cardiac ablations, 3777 (9%) index ablation procedures had available and matching NLP note terms. Of these, 22% (n = 844) were classified as ablation, 27% (n = 1016) as cryoablation, 49% (n = 1855) as radiofrequency ablation, and 1.6% (n = 62) as both. In the multiple procedures analysis, 5691 (14%) procedures had matching note terms. 24% (n = 1362) were classified as ablation, 27% as cryoablation, 47% as radiofrequency ablation, and 2% as both. NLP has potential to evaluate the frequency of cardiac ablation by type, however, for this to be a reliable real-world data source, mandatory data entry by providers and standardized electronic health reporting must occur.