AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates how the vestibular system (which helps maintain balance) responds during real-world walking, considering that previous lab research might not fully apply to outdoor settings.
  • - Ten participants walked outdoors at two different speeds while receiving electrical stimulation to their vestibular system and wearing devices that measured movement in their head and limbs.
  • - Results showed that the vestibular responses varied during the walking cycle and decreased with faster speeds, confirming previous lab findings and demonstrating the effectiveness of the portable measurement system used.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The vestibular system, which encodes our head movement in space, plays an important role in maintaining our balance as we navigate the environment. While in-laboratory research demonstrates that the vestibular system exerts a context-dependent influence on the control of balance during locomotion, differences in whole-body and head kinematics between indoor treadmill and real-world locomotion challenge the generalizability of these findings. Thus, the goal of this study was to characterize vestibular-evoked balance responses in the real world using a fully portable system.

Methods: While experiencing stochastic electrical vestibular stimulation (0-20 Hz, amplitude peak ± 4.5 mA, root mean square 1.25 mA) and wearing inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the head, low back, and ankles, 10 participants walked outside at 52 steps/minute (∼0.4 m/s) and 78 steps/minute (∼0.8 m/s). We calculated time-dependent coherence (a measure of correlation in the frequency domain) between the applied stimulus and the mediolateral back, right ankle, and left ankle linear accelerations to infer the vestibular control of balance during locomotion.

Results: In all participants, we observed vestibular-evoked balance responses. These responses exhibited phasic modulation across the stride cycle, peaking during the middle of the single-leg stance in the back and during the stance phase for the ankles. Coherence decreased with increasing locomotor cadence and speed, as observed in both bootstrapped coherence differences ( < 0.01) and peak coherence (low back: 0.23 ± 0.07 vs. 0.16 ± 0.14, = 0.021; right ankle: 0.38 ± 0.12 vs. 0.25 ± 0.10, < 0.001; left ankle: 0.33 ± 0.09 vs. 0.21 ± 0.09, < 0.001).

Discussion: These results replicate previous in-laboratory studies, thus providing further insight into the vestibular control of balance during naturalistic movements and validating the use of this portable system as a method to characterize real-world vestibular responses. This study will help support future work that seeks to better understand how the vestibular system contributes to balance in variable real-world environments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10800732PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1329097DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vestibular system
12
control balance
12
vestibular
8
vestibular-evoked balance
8
balance responses
8
left ankle
8
vestibular control
8
balance
7
real-world
4
real-world characterization
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!