Review of the Screening Guidelines for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: How to Choose Wisely.

Indian J Community Med

Department of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Published: December 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • There is no global consensus on the timing, optimal cut-off points, or standardized methods for screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), even though guidelines have evolved over time.
  • A review analyzed various screening guidelines from multiple databases and found that GDM prevalence rates differ based on criteria, with the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) showing 14.6% and Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) showing 13.4%. The DIPSI method is noted as cost-effective for low-resource settings.
  • Key risk factors for GDM include family history, previous GDM, medical conditions, multiple pregnancies, and high hemoglobin A

Article Abstract

Currently, there is no international unanimity regarding the timings, the optimal cut-off points, and standardized methods of screening or diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The screening guidelines and recommendations for GDM evolved over time; concise information has been presented here in the review. We searched electronic databases for various guidelines for screening of GDM in PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Scopus, Guidelines International Network (GIN library), National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC); Web sites of relevant organizations; and trial registries. The mesh headings derived after reviewing the articles and were used to further search the articles are: ("Screening Guidelines GDM" or "Screening Criteria for GDM") and ("Glucose Intolerance in Pregnancy" or "Gestational Diabetes Mellitus"). The articles published from 1960 till December 2022 were included. Key outcomes included the prevalence of GDM is 14.6% according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria and 13.4% according to Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) criteria, making the DIPSI criterion a cost-effective method for low-resource settings. The IADPSG) criterion diagnoses and treats GDM earlier, thus reducing the complications associated with GDM in the mother and newborn. The IADPSG criteria at a cut-off of ≥140 mg/dL have a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 93%, whereas the World Health Organization (2013) criteria at the same cut-off has a lower sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 81%. The risk factors of having GDM are family history, history during past pregnancy, medical history, multiple current pregnancies, and raised hemoglobin A1c. The screening guidelines have been developed by different organizations and institutions over the years. The guidelines with the threshold values for screening and their standardization for detecting GDM in Indian mothers are yet to be established.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795887PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_298_23DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening guidelines
12
guidelines
8
gestational diabetes
8
diabetes mellitus
8
gdm
8
diabetes pregnancy
8
pregnancy study
8
iadpsg criteria
8
criteria cut-off
8
diabetes
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!