A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Scales Reported in Stroke Trials: A Review. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • There is increasing recognition of minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) in stroke research, representing meaningful changes in patient outcomes.
  • This review offers a detailed overview of various scales and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in stroke studies, along with their MCID values and methodologies for determining them.
  • Despite some challenges in estimating MCIDs, using both anchor-based and distribution-based methods, along with patient self-evaluation, is essential for accurately assessing treatment effects and improving stroke care.

Article Abstract

There is a growing awareness of the significance of using minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) in stroke research. An MCID is the smallest change in an outcome measure that is considered clinically meaningful. This review is the first to provide a comprehensive summary of various scales and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in stroke research and their MCID values reported in the literature, including a concise overview of the concept of and methods for determining MCIDs in stroke research. Despite the controversies and limitations surrounding the estimation of MCIDs, their importance in modern clinical trials cannot be overstated. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods are recommended for estimating MCIDs, with patient self-evaluation being a crucial component in capturing the patient's perspective on their health. A combination of methods can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the clinical relevance of treatment effects, and incorporating the patient's perspective can enhance the care of stroke patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10813687PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14010080DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mcids stroke
8
stroke mcid
8
provide comprehensive
8
patient's perspective
8
stroke
5
minimal clinically
4
clinically difference
4
difference scales
4
scales reported
4
reported stroke
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!