AI Article Synopsis

  • Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision loss in diabetics, and this study assesses how effectively artificial intelligence (AI) can detect DME through fundus photography (FP) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.
  • The analysis included 53 studies, revealing that AI models based on FP achieved an area under the curve (AUROC) of 0.964 with 92.6% sensitivity, while OCT-based models performed even better with an AUROC of 0.985 and 95.9% sensitivity.
  • The study highlights the need for better external validation and larger, more diverse training datasets to enhance AI performance in detecting DME, pointing to factors like deep learning and sample

Article Abstract

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the leading cause of vision loss in people with diabetes. Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in interpreting fundus photography (FP) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images allows prompt detection and intervention.

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of AI in detecting DME from FP or OCT images and identify potential factors affecting model performances.

Data Sources: We searched seven electronic libraries up to 12 February 2023.

Study Selection: We included studies using AI to detect DME from FP or OCT images.

Data Extraction: We extracted study characteristics and performance parameters.

Data Synthesis: Fifty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. FP-based algorithms of 25 studies yielded pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.964, 92.6%, and 91.1%, respectively. OCT-based algorithms of 28 studies yielded pooled AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.985, 95.9%, and 97.9%, respectively. Potential factors improving model performance included deep learning techniques, larger size, and more diversity in training data sets. Models demonstrated better performance when validated internally than externally, and those trained with multiple data sets showed better results upon external validation.

Limitations: Analyses were limited by unstandardized algorithm outcomes and insufficient data in patient demographics, OCT volumetric scans, and external validation.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates satisfactory performance of AI in detecting DME from FP or OCT images. External validation is warranted for future studies to evaluate model generalizability. Further investigations may estimate optimal sample size, effect of class balance, patient demographics, and additional benefits of OCT volumetric scans.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc23-0993DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oct images
12
dme oct
12
artificial intelligence
8
diabetic macular
8
macular edema
8
fundus photography
8
photography optical
8
optical coherence
8
coherence tomography
8
performance detecting
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!