AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a specialized neurocognitive assessment for survivors of childhood acute leukemia with Down syndrome (DS-leukemia) and compare their outcomes to those with Down syndrome but no cancer history (DS-control).
  • The assessment involved 43 DS-leukemia survivors and showed feasible completion rates and significant differences in executive function and processing speed compared to the DS-control group.
  • Findings revealed that while DS-leukemia survivors had lower completion rates in some areas, they performed better in certain executive function tasks, but reported greater overall executive function problems.

Article Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a developmentally tailored neurocognitive assessment in survivors of childhood acute leukemia with Down syndrome (DS-leukemia). A secondary aim was to compare outcomes in the DS-leukemia group to a historical comparison group of individuals with DS and no history of childhood cancer.

Methods: Survivors of DS-leukemia (n = 43; 56% male, mean [SD] age at diagnosis = 4.3 [4.5] years; age at evaluation = 15 [7.9] years) completed a neurocognitive assessment battery that included direct measures of attention, executive function, and processing speed, and proxy ratings of attention problems and executive dysfunction. Direct assessment outcomes were compared to a historical comparison cohort of individuals with DS and no history of childhood cancer (DS-control; n = 117; 56% male, mean [SD] age at evaluation = 12.7 [3.4] years).

Results: Rates of valid task completion ranged from 54% to 95%, suggesting feasibility for most direct assessment measures. Compared to the DS-control group, the DS-leukemia group had significantly lower completion rates on measures of executive function (p = 0.008) and processing speed (p = 0.018) compared to the DS-control group. There were no other significant group differences in completion rates. Compared to the DS-control group, the DS-leukemia group had significantly more accurate performance on two measures of executive function (p = 0.032; p = 0.005). Compared to the DS-control group, the DS-leukemia group had significantly more problems with executive function as identified on proxy ratings (6.5% vs. 32.6%, p = <0.001).

Conclusion: Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at increased risk for developing acute leukemia compared to the general population but are systematically excluded from neurocognitive outcome studies among leukemia survivors. This study demonstrated the feasibility of evaluating neurocognitive late effects in leukemia survivors with DS using novel measures appropriate for populations with intellectual developmental disorder.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10905531PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6842DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ds-leukemia group
16
executive function
16
compared ds-control
16
ds-control group
16
group ds-leukemia
12
group
10
survivors childhood
8
leukemia syndrome
8
neurocognitive assessment
8
historical comparison
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!