A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Hamstrings mechanical properties profiling in football players of different competitive levels and positions after a repeated sprint protocol. | LitMetric

Hamstrings mechanical properties profiling in football players of different competitive levels and positions after a repeated sprint protocol.

Front Physiol

CIPER, Centro Interdisciplinar de Performance Humana, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Published: January 2024

This study compares the average speed, knee flexor peak torque and shear modulus of the hamstrings after a repeated sprint task, in football players of different competitive levels and playing positions. Fifty-four football field players without hamstring strain injury history participated, 15 being categorized as professional (2nd league) and 39 as semi-professional (17 in 3rd and 22 in 4th league). Muscle shear modulus was assessed using ultrasound-based shear wave elastography at rest and at 20% of maximal voluntary isometric effort before and immediately after the repeated sprint protocol. No significant differences were seen in average sprint speed between competitive levels ( = 0.07; η2 = 0.28) and positions ( = 0.052; η2 = 0.29). Moreover, the sprint fatigue index showed no significant differences between competitive levels ( = 0.14; η2 = 0.08) and playing positions ( = 0.89; η2 = 0.05). No significant differences were observed in hamstring shear modulus changes between competitive levels ( = 0.94; η2 = 0.03) and positions ( = 0.92; η2 = 0.03). Peak torque changes also showed non-significant association with competitive levels ( = 0.46; η2 = 0.03) and positions ( = 0.60; η2 = 0.02). The results of this study suggest that the average sprint speed performance parameter and mechanical parameters are not able to distinguish football players of different competitive levels and positions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10794661PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1315564DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

competitive levels
28
football players
12
players competitive
12
repeated sprint
12
shear modulus
12
η2 003
12
levels positions
8
sprint protocol
8
peak torque
8
playing positions
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!