A 3D-Printed Externally Adjustable Symmetrically Extensible (EASE) Aortic Annuloplasty Ring for Root Repair and Aortic Valve Regurgitation.

Cardiovasc Eng Technol

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Falk Cardiovascular Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA.

Published: April 2024

Purpose: The valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) procedure was developed to preserve the aortic valve apparatus to replace aneurysmal aortic roots with synthetic grafts and to eliminate associated aortic regurgitation (AR). However, residual post-repair AR is not uncommon and has been found to be associated with recurrent AR and future reoperation.

Methods: We designed and manufactured a 3D-printed, external adjustable symmetrically extensible (EASE) aortic annuloplasty ring that can symmetrically reduce the aortic annulus diameter via a radial constriction, compliant mechanism. An ex vivo porcine VSARR model with annular dilation and AR was developed (n = 4) and used for hemodynamic, echocardiography, and high-speed videography data collection.

Results: After ring annuloplasty repair using the EASE aortic ring, the regurgitant fraction decreased from 23.6 ± 6.9% from the VSARR model to 7.4 ± 5.6% (p = 0.05), which was similar to that measured from baseline with a regurgitant fraction of 10.2 ± 3.9% (p = 0.34). The leaflet coaptation height after annuloplasty repair also significantly increased from that measured in VSARR model (0.4 ± 0.1 cm) to 0.9 ± 0.1 cm (p = 0.0004), a level similar to that measured in baseline (1.1 ± 0.1 cm, p = 0.28).

Conclusion: Using an ex vivo VSARR model, the EASE ring successfully reduced AR by reducing the annular diameter and improving leaflet coaptation. With its broad applicability and ease of use, this device has the potential to have a significant impact on patients suffering worldwide from AR due to root aneurysms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13239-024-00709-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vsarr model
16
ease aortic
12
aortic
9
adjustable symmetrically
8
symmetrically extensible
8
extensible ease
8
aortic annuloplasty
8
annuloplasty ring
8
aortic valve
8
annuloplasty repair
8

Similar Publications

Background: For patients with aortic root dilatation and a structurally normal aortic valve (AV) undergoing composite aortic valve-graft (Bentall-De Bono) versus valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) procedures there are conflicting data regarding early and long-term benefits. We undertook a study-level meta-analysis to compare the results of both procedures.

Methods: Three databases were assessed, and both randomized trials and observational studies were considered eligible.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) procedure was developed to preserve the aortic valve apparatus to replace aneurysmal aortic roots with synthetic grafts and to eliminate associated aortic regurgitation (AR). However, residual post-repair AR is not uncommon and has been found to be associated with recurrent AR and future reoperation.

Methods: We designed and manufactured a 3D-printed, external adjustable symmetrically extensible (EASE) aortic annuloplasty ring that can symmetrically reduce the aortic annulus diameter via a radial constriction, compliant mechanism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bicuspid aortic valve durability with valve-sparing aortic root replacement: comparison to tricuspid valve.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

April 2023

Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Objectives: Outcomes beyond 10 years for David V valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients have yet to be explored. We investigated long-term outcomes after BAV VSARR compared to VSARR for tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients.

Methods: A total of 677 patients with BAV (n = 171) and TAV (n = 506) underwent VSARR between 2005 and 2020 from 2 aortic centres, excluding those with dissection, endocarditis, stenosis or prior aortic valve (AV) surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare aortic flow patterns in patients after David valve-sparing aortic root replacement with physiologically shaped sinus prostheses or conventional tube grafts in healthy volunteers.

Methods: Twelve patients with sinus prostheses (55 ± 15 years), 6 patients with tube grafts (58 ± 12 years), 12 age-matched, healthy volunteers (55 ± 6 years), and 6 young, healthy volunteers (25 ± 3 years) were examined with time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI). Primary and secondary helical, as well as vortical flow patterns, were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis (Uni-Graft W SINUS; Braun, Melsungen, Germany) used in valve-sparing aortic root replacement promises physiological hemodynamics believed to grant physiologic valve function. Using time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI), we analyzed sinus vortex formation and transvalvular pressure gradients in patients with sinus prosthesis compared with age-matched and young healthy volunteers.

Methods: Twelve patients with sinus prosthesis (55 ± 15 years), 12 age-matched and 6 young healthy volunteers (55 ± 6 years, 25 ± 3 years, respectively) were examined at 3T with a 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging sequence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!