This study aimed to analyze the impact of strontium ranelate (Str), photobiomodulation (PBM), or their combination of the proliferation, osteogenic differentiation, and cementogenic differentiation of buccal fat pad-derived stem cells. BFPdSCs were exposed to one of the following interventions: (1) PBM (660 nm), (2) PBM (660 nm) + Str, (3) PBM (880 nm), (4) PBM (880 nm) + Str, (5) Str. All study groups had significantly higher osteogenic differentiation than the control group (p < 0.05), and no significant difference existed between the 660 and 808 nm groups (p = 0.97). Compared to the Str group, 660 nm and 880 nm group samples had significantly lower osteogenic differentiation (p < 0.0001), while other groups did not show a significant difference. Regarding cementogenic differentiation, the 660 nm group showed higher values than the 808 nm group (p < 0.01). Compared with the Str group, 660 nm, 660 nm + Str, and 808 nm + Str groups showed significantly higher gene expression (p < 0.05). In the case of osteogenic differentiation, although photobiomodulation alone had a lower inducing effect than strontium ranelate, combining 808 nm diode lasers and strontium ranelate may provide the best results. Moreover, using a 660 nm diode laser and exposing stem cells to strontium ranelate can be the most effective approach to induce cementogenic differentiation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/php.13902DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

osteogenic differentiation
12
strontium ranelate
8
differentiation buccal
8
buccal fat
8
fat pad-derived
8
pad-derived stem
8
stem cells
8
pbm
5
evaluating strontium
4
ranelate photobiomodulation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!