AI Article Synopsis

  • Recent studies indicate that accelerated recovery protocols after colorectal surgery can be effective, but protocols vary and most studies involve small patient groups, complicating the ability to determine the best approach.
  • A systematic review analyzed trials from various databases showing that accelerated recovery led to shorter hospital stays (14 hours to 3.4 days) with varying complication (0-35.7%) and readmission rates (0-17%).
  • Despite promising findings, the data is inconsistent and lacks comprehensive outcome measures, meaning accelerated recovery can't yet be classified as the new standard of care, although it seems to be safe for certain patients.

Article Abstract

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that accelerated enhanced recovery after colorectal surgery is feasible for specific patient populations. The accelerated enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) tend to vary, and the majority of studies included a small study population. This hampers defining the optimal protocol and establishing the potential benefits. This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of accelerated ERPs with intended discharge within one day after surgery.

Methods: PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched using the following search terms: colon cancer, colon surgery, accelerated recovery, fast track recovery, enhanced recovery after surgery. Clinical trials published between January 2005 - February 2023, written in English or Dutch comparing accelerated ERPs to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care for adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or robotic surgery for colon cancer were eligible for inclusion.

Results: Thirteen studies, including one RCT were included. Accelerated ERPs after colorectal surgery was possible as LOS was shorter; 14 h to 3.4 days, and complication rate varied from 0-35.7% and readmission rate was 0-17% in the accelerated ERP groups. Risk of bias was serious or critical in most of the included studies.

Conclusions: Accelerated ERPs may not yet be considered the new standard of care as the current data is heterogenous, and data on important outcome measures is scarce. Nonetheless, the decreased LOS suggests that accelerated recovery is possible for selected patients. In addition, the complication and readmission rates were comparable to ERAS care, suggesting that accelerated recovery could be safe.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795207PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11803-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enhanced recovery
20
accelerated erps
16
accelerated enhanced
12
colon cancer
12
accelerated recovery
12
accelerated
11
recovery
9
surgery
8
discharge day
8
systematic review
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!