PFO closure: How to simplify?

Arch Cardiovasc Dis

Institut Cœur Poumon, CHRU of Lille, Lille, France.

Published: February 2024

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2023.12.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pfo closure
4
closure simplify?
4
pfo
1
simplify?
1

Similar Publications

We aimed to evaluate the incidence of residual shunt after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and analyze the anatomical features of PFO to determine the risk factors for significant residual shunt after PFO closure. Ninety-two patients who underwent PFO closure at our center between September 2021 and June 2022 were consecutively enrolled. Transthoracic saline contrast echocardiography was performed at 6 and 12 months postoperatively to evaluate the presence of a significant residual shunt.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Arrhythmias Following Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: An Unsolved Enigma.

Life (Basel)

December 2024

First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 114, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has proven to be an effective method of reducing the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of unknown origin (ESUS). One of the most recognized post-procedural complications is the de novo occurrence of supraventricular arrhythmias, mainly atrial fibrillation, in the first three months following PFO closure. Earlier studies reported the incidence to be around 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the short-term efficacy of right-to-left shunt closure in vestibular migraine patients, and compare the efficacy between patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM) embolization. Additionally, the study identifies factors related to surgical outcomes.

Methods: Forty-one patients with vestibular migraine and medium to large right-to-left shunts underwent surgery: PFO closure, PAVM embolization, or both.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure using percutaneous devices, such as the Amplatzer occluder, is a common treatment for patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Although generally well-tolerated, some patients may develop adverse reactions to the device materials, particularly in the presence of a nickel allergy. Symptoms can include chest pain, rashes, and migraines, which may necessitate surgical removal of the device.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) using transseptal puncture has particular advantages and disadvantages. Thus, transseptal puncture should be re-evaluated in detail.

Aims: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the detailed transseptal puncture technique in patients who underwent PFO closure due to cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack in terms of residual shunts and atrial fibrillation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!