Rationale And Objectives: Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts has been a major breakthrough causing a paradigm shift in targeted theranostics focusing on the tumor microenvironment. In this study, a squaric acid derivative DOTA.SA.FAPi (SA.FAPi) has been evaluated as a potential diagnostic probe in diverse epithelial cancers and compared to the standard-of-care F-FDG.

Methods: 25 patients enrolled in this prospective study underwent F-FDG and Ga-SA.FAPi PET scans on two different days. For biodistribution, standardized uptake values (SUV) were computed by delineating region-of-interest on various body organs. For comparative analysis in disease identification, lesion tracer uptake was quantified using SUVs corrected for lean body mass (SUL), SUV, tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) with liver and blood pool as the reference, total lesion glycolysis (TLG for F-FDG) and total lesion FAP expression (TLF for Ga-SA.FAPi).

Results: 25 patients (mean age: 58 ± 8 years) with four types of cancers including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 56% of cohort), gall bladder carcinoma (GB Ca, 12%), adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC, 16%), and breast carcinoma (breast Ca, 16%) were prospectively evaluated. Physiological tracer uptake of Ga-SA.FAPi was noted in the salivary glands, thyroid, liver, pancreas, muscles and kidneys with variable uptake in the lacrimal glands, extra-ocular muscles, oral mucosa and uterus. Lesion-based comparative analysis between both the radiotracers demonstrated complete concordant findings in detection of all primary lesions and distant metastases in liver, bones, adrenals and peritoneum whereas discordant findings were noted in lung nodules (20%) and lymph nodes (13%). In overall analysis, Ga-SA.FAPi exhibited significantly higher SUV (10.3 vs 8.8, p-0.019), SUL (6.8 vs 4.9, p-0.000) and SUL (5.4 vs 4.1, p-0.019) in comparison to F-FDG whereas TBR was comparable for both the tracers [TBR: median 1.9 (IQR: 2.6-1.4) vs 1.8 (2.6-1.1), p-0.275; TBR: 2.1 (3.7-1.4) vs 2.0 (2.7-1.4), p-0.207]. In subcategorical analysis, Ga-SA.FAPi demonstrated higher SUV, SUL and SUL values for primary disease (SUV: 14.8 (18.7-9.7) vs (12.9-6.6), p-0.087; SUL: 8.2 (11.2-6.8) vs 6.3 (8.5-4.4), p-0.037; SUL: 6.9 ± 2.5 vs 5.1 ± 2.2, p-0.023] and distant metastases (8.8 vs 7.2, p-0.038); 6.3 (8.8-4.4) vs 3.6 (4.4-2.0), p-0.000; 5.4 vs 3.5, p-0.000] whereas comparable values were noted for both the tracers in nodal metastases [9 (13.5-4.1) vs 8 (12.7-4.7), p-0.726; 4.5 (6.2-1.8) vs 4.3 (5.7-2.2), p-0.727; 4.1 ± 2.3 vs 3.7 ± 1.8, p-0.129]. In primary disease, highest Ga-SA.FAPi avidity was noted in ACC followed by GB Ca and HCC. In distant metastases, gall bladder, lung and skeletal lesions demonstrated higher Ga-SA.FAPi avidity. Moreover, Ga-SA.FAPi identified five additional lung lesions which were missed by F-FDG in one case of ACC.

Conclusion: Ga-SA.FAPi emerged as an effective, versatile diagnostic probe for imaging various epithelial malignancies similar to F-FDG.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic probe
12
distant metastases
12
versatile diagnostic
8
epithelial malignancies
8
comparison f-fdg
8
ga-safapi
8
comparative analysis
8
tracer uptake
8
total lesion
8
gall bladder
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!