AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the effectiveness and safety of costal chondrocyte-derived pellet-type autologous chondrocyte implantation (CCP-ACI) versus microfracture for knee cartilage defects over a 5-year period.
  • At the 5-year follow-up, CCP-ACI showed significantly better results in MRI assessments and clinical outcome scores (like Lysholm and KOOS) than microfracture.
  • Overall, both procedures improved patient outcomes over time, but CCP-ACI demonstrated superior benefits compared to microfracture.

Article Abstract

Background: Costal chondrocyte-derived pellet-type autologous chondrocyte implantation (CCP-ACI) has been introduced as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of articular cartilage defects. We had previously conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing CCP-ACI versus microfracture at 1 year postoperatively.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of CCP-ACI versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee at 5 years postoperatively.

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: This study describes the mean 5-year follow-up of a previously published prospective clinical trial. The previous prospective trial compared the results of CCP-ACI versus microfracture until 1 year of follow-up. Of the 30 patients who were included in the previous study, 25 were followed up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated based on clinical outcome scores (Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and visual analog scale for pain), magnetic resonance imaging findings, and rates of treatment failure at last follow-up.

Results: The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score in the CCP-ACI group was significantly higher than that in the microfracture group at 5 years (62.3 vs 26.7, respectively; < .0001). The Lysholm score and KOOS score in the CCP-ACI group were significantly higher than those in the microfracture group at 5 years (84.5 vs 64.9, respectively, and 390.9 vs 303.0, respectively; = .023 and = .017, respectively). There was 1 case of treatment failure that occurred in the microfracture group.

Conclusion: The present randomized controlled trial indicated that the results of both procedures clinically and statistically significantly improved at 1 and 5 years' follow-up in treating cartilage defects, but the results of CCP-ACI were superior to those of microfracture. Magnetic resonance imaging conducted at 1 year and 5 years after CCP-ACI revealed statistically significant superior structural integration with native cartilage tissue compared with microfracture.

Registration: NCT03545269 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465231222797DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

versus microfracture
16
cartilage defects
16
treatment articular
12
articular cartilage
12
randomized controlled
12
controlled trial
12
ccp-aci versus
12
magnetic resonance
12
costal chondrocyte-derived
8
chondrocyte-derived pellet-type
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!