Consensus on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in civilian (prehospital) trauma care: A Delphi study.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

From the Department of Surgery (J.C.vdV., B.L.S.B.vdB., R.H.), Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp; Trauma Research Unit, Department of Trauma Surgery (J.C.vdV., R.H.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Division of General Surgery and Trauma (B.K.), Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine (B.K.), Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Defense Healthcare Organization (B.L.S.B.vdB., R.H.), Ministry of Defense, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care (J.J.DB.), Dell School of Medicine, University of Texas, Austin, Texas; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health (T.M.H.), and Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery (T.M.H.), Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro Hospital and University, Örebro, Sweden.

Published: June 2024

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) could prevent lethal exsanguination and support cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In prehospital trauma and medical emergency settings, a small population with high mortality rates could potentially benefit from early REBOA deployment. However, its use in these situations remains highly disputed. Since publication of the first Delphi study on REBOA, in which consensus was not reached on all addressed topics, new literature has emerged. The aim of this study was to establish consensus on the use and implementation of REBOA in civilian prehospital settings for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest as well as for various in-hospital settings.

Methods: A Delphi study consisting of three rounds of questionnaires was conducted based on a review of recent literature. REBOA experts with different medical specialties, backgrounds, and work environments were invited for the international panel. Consensus was reached when a minimum of 75% of panelists responded to a question and at least 75% (positive) or less than 25% (negative) of these respondents agreed on the questioned subject.

Results: Panel members reached consensus on potential (contra)indications, physiological thresholds for patient selection, the use of ultrasound and practical, and technical aspects for early femoral artery access and prehospital REBOA.

Conclusion: The international expert panel agreed that REBOA can be used in civilian prehospital settings for temporary control of noncompressible truncal hemorrhage, provided that personnel are properly trained and protocols are established. For prehospital REBOA and early femoral artery access, consensus was reached on (contra)indications, physiological thresholds and practical aspects. The panel recommends the initiation of a randomized clinical trial investigating the use of prehospital REBOA for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004238DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

civilian prehospital
12
delphi study
12
consensus reached
12
noncompressible truncal
12
resuscitative endovascular
8
endovascular balloon
8
balloon occlusion
8
occlusion aorta
8
prehospital trauma
8
reboa
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!