Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In this paper, we explore the effects of multimodal haptic feedback combining vibrotactile and electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) on expressing virtual collisions. We first present a wearable multimodal haptic device capable of generating both mechanical vibration and EMS stimuli. The two types of haptic stimulus are combined into a haptic rendering method that conveys improved virtual collision sensations. This multimodal rendering method highlights the strengths of each modality while compensating for mutual weaknesses. The multimodal rendering method is compared in subjective quality with two unimodal methods (vibration only and EMS only) by a user study. Experimental results demonstrate that our multimodal feedback method can elicit more realistic, enjoyable, expressive, and preferable user experiences.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2024.3354268 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!