AI Article Synopsis

  • Automated perfusion imaging can identify stroke patients eligible for thrombolysis, but it's not widely available; a new method using CT hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch offers a potential alternative.
  • In a study involving 247 patients, 88.7% were deemed eligible for thrombolysis, with the hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch detecting 96.4% of eligible patients within the 4.5-hour time frame compared to only 44.7% by the automated method.
  • This new CT method demonstrated higher sensitivity for identifying eligible patients but lower specificity, suggesting that it could help more patients receive treatment.

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: Automated perfusion imaging can detect stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset who are eligible for thrombolysis. However, the availability of this technique is limited. We, therefore, established the novel concept of computed tomography (CT) hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch, i.e., an ischemic core lesion visible on cerebral perfusion CT without visible hypodensity in the corresponding native cerebral CT. We compared both methods regarding their accuracy in identifying patients suitable for thrombolysis.

Methods: In a retrospective analysis of the MissPerfeCT observational cohort study, patients were classified as suitable or not for thrombolysis based on established time window and imaging criteria. We calculated predictive values for hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch and automated perfusion imaging to compare accuracy in the identification of patients suitable for thrombolysis.

Results: Of 247 patients, 219 (88.7%) were eligible for thrombolysis and 28 (11.3%) were not eligible for thrombolysis. Of 197 patients who were within 4.5 h of symptom onset, 190 (96.4%) were identified by hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch and 88 (44.7%) by automated perfusion mismatch ( < 0.001). Of 22 patients who were beyond 4.5 h of symptom onset but were eligible for thrombolysis, 5 patients (22.7%) were identified by hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch. Predictive values for the hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch vs. automated perfusion mismatch were as follows: sensitivity, 89.0% vs. 50.2%; specificity, 71.4% vs. 100.0%; positive predictive value, 96.1% vs. 100.0%; and negative predictive value, 45.5% vs. 20.4%.

Conclusion: The novel method of hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch can identify patients suitable for thrombolysis with higher sensitivity and lower specificity than established techniques. Using this simple method might therefore increase the proportion of patients treated with thrombolysis without the use of special automated software.The MissPerfeCT study is a retrospective observational multicenter cohort study and is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04277728).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10788186PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1320620DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch
16
automated perfusion
16
eligible thrombolysis
16
computed tomography
8
tomography hypoperfusion-hypodensity
8
mismatch automated
8
perfusion mismatch
8
stroke patients
8
perfusion imaging
8
symptom onset
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!