AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the safety and cardiovascular outcomes of cancer patients with heart failure (HF) who were treated with midodrine for hypotension.
  • A total of 85 patients were analyzed, showing various types of HF, with the primary reason for midodrine use being orthostatic hypotension; side effects were generally minimal.
  • No significant differences in heart function or mortality risk were found between those who continued midodrine and those who stopped, although elevated creatinine levels were linked to higher mortality risk.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and cardiovascular outcomes as well as overall survival of cancer patients with concomitant heart failure (HF) treated with midodrine for hypotension.

Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with cancer and HF who were treated with midodrine at a tertiary cancer center from 03/2013 to 08/2021 were identified. Demographic and clinical parameters were collected retrospectively.

Results: A total of 85 patients were included with a median age of 68 years (IQR: 60, 74; 33% female and 85% White). Of those, 31% had HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%), 42% HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF; EF 41-49%), and 27% HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%). The most common indication for midodrine use was orthostatic hypotension (49%). Midodrine was continued for at least one month in 57% of the patients. Supine hypertension was the only side effect reported in 6% of patients. No statistically significant changes in NYHA class, guideline-directed medical therapy, cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP or troponin T), echocardiographic findings or cardiovascular hospitalizations were observed between patients who continued treatment with midodrine compared to those who stopped using midodrine over a median follow-up of 38 months. In the multivariable cox regression analysis, continuation of midodrine, compared to discontinuation, and use of midodrine for orthostatic hypotension, as opposed to other causes of hypotension, were not associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24-0.69, p < .0001; HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.64, p < .001, respectively). In contrast, elevated creatinine (> 1.3 for males and > 1.1 for females) was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.07-3.14). LVEF was not significantly associated with lower or higher risk of mortality.

Conclusions: In our study, midodrine use in patients with cancer and HF was not associated with significant adverse effects, worse cardiovascular outcomes, or increased risk of mortality. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10557-024-07546-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

increased risk
12
risk mortality
12
midodrine
9
patients
8
patients cancer
8
heart failure
8
cardiovascular outcomes
8
treated midodrine
8
midodrine orthostatic
8
orthostatic hypotension
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!