A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Fluorescein videoangiography data analysis protocol for mapping retinal vascular permeability in humans. | LitMetric

Fluorescein video angiographies (FVAs) are a diagnostic tool for eye diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy (DR). Currently, kinetic tracer model methods based on indicator-dilutions theory use FVAs to extract biomarkers (e.g., volumetric blood flow and retinal vascular permeability) via pixel mapping using two-step non-linear least square fitting. Prior to biomarker extraction, the FVAs must attain optimal quality. The objective of this research is to create a program to remove all frames experiencing signal drops (causes include blinking, squinting, and head movement). 15 FVAs (6 healthy control subjects, 6 diabetes mellitus no DR (DMnoDR) subjects, and 3 mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR) subjects) were analyzed for low quality frames. The average signal of each frame was analyzed as top, middle, and bottom thirds. The frame with maximum average signal up to the final frame of a created "Gold Standard" was compared with the raw AVI's frame with maximum average signal and subsequent frames. All frames before maximum average signal and any remaining frames were compared with the previous good-quality raw frame to determine if the frame of interest was of good quality. All remaining frames were subsequently re-evaluated and flagged if they had a local minimum prominence of 10% of the maximum average signal. The flagged frames', as well as former and subsequent frames', quality were subjectively determined. The AVI quality was subsequently tested via pre-DTKM processing and biomarker extraction via DTKM methods. Results displayed that the semi-automated frame removal process provides sufficient quality AVIs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786580PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2650304DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

average signal
20
maximum average
16
retinal vascular
8
vascular permeability
8
biomarker extraction
8
frame maximum
8
remaining frames
8
frame
7
quality
6
frames
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!