A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Does inbreeding contribute to pregnancy loss in Thoroughbred horses? | LitMetric

Background: Excessive inbreeding increases the probability of uncovering homozygous recessive genotypes and has been associated with an increased risk of retained placenta and lower semen quality. No genomic analysis has investigated the association between inbreeding levels and pregnancy loss.

Objectives: To compare genetic inbreeding coefficients (F) of naturally occurring Thoroughbred Early Pregnancy Loss (EPLs), Mid and Late term Pregnancy Loss (MLPL) and Controls. The F value was hypothesised to be higher in cases of pregnancy loss (EPLs and MLPLs) than Controls.

Study Design: Observational case-control study.

Methods: Allantochorion and fetal DNA from EPL (n = 37, gestation age 14-65 days), MLPL (n = 94, gestational age 70 days-24 h post parturition) and Controls (n = 58) were genotyped on the Axiom Equine 670K SNP Genotyping Array. Inbreeding coefficients using Runs of Homozygosity (FROH) were calculated using PLINK software. ROHs were split into size categories to investigate the recency of inbreeding.

Results: MLPLs had significantly higher median number of ROH (188 interquartile range [IQR], 180.8-197.3), length of ROH (3.10, IQR 2.93-3.33), and total number of ROH (590.8, IQR 537.3-632.3), and F (0.26, IQR 0.24-0.28) when compared with the Controls and the EPLs (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in any of the inbreeding indices between the EPLs and Controls. The MLPLs had a significantly higher proportion of long (>10 Mb) ROH (2.5%, IQR 1.6-3.6) than the Controls (1.7%, IQR 0.6-2.5), p = 0.001. No unique ROHs were found in the EPL or MLPL populations.

Main Limitations: SNP-array data does not allow analysis of every base in the sequence.

Conclusions: This first study of the effect of genomic inbreeding levels on pregnancy loss showed that inbreeding is a contributor to MLPL, but not EPL in the UK Thoroughbred population. Mating choices remain critical, because inbreeding may predispose to MLPL by increasing the risk of homozygosity for specific lethal allele(s).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evj.14057DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pregnancy loss
20
inbreeding
8
inbreeding levels
8
levels pregnancy
8
inbreeding coefficients
8
loss epls
8
number roh
8
pregnancy
6
loss
5
mlpl
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!