Background: This study aimed to validate the IberScore cardiovascular risk model in a population attended in the primary care setting.
Methods: A cohort of patients with no history of cardiovascular disease visited in a primary care center during the years 2008 and/or 2009 and followed up until 2018 was selected. Cardiovascular risk was calculated with the IberScore formula for all the subjects of the cohort and the model was calibrated, graphically represented by risk deciles the proportion of expected events and proportion of observed events at 10-year follow-up, stratified by sex. The area under the ROC curve was calculated to assess the discrimination of the model.
Results: A total of 10,085 patients visited during the years 2008 and/or 2009 were included in the study. Men showed a mean 10-year risk of suffering a fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events according to IberScore of 17.07% (SD 20.13), with a mean estimated vascular age of more than 4 years higher than the biological age; while women had a mean 10-year risk of 7.91% (SD 9.03), with an estimated vascular age of more than 2 years above the biological age. The area under the ROC curve showed a discrimination index of the model of 0.86 (95% CI 0.84-0.88) in men and 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.85) in women.
Conclusion: IberScore model discriminates well in the population attended in primary care but the model overestimates the risk.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arteri.2023.12.003 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!