According to recent regulatory guidance, clinical trial objectives should be translated into estimands, i.e., precise descriptions of that what is to be estimated. Hence, estimands are to be formulated for influenza vaccine immunogenicity (IVI) trials, notably for one of the most popular immunogenicity trials, the non-inferiority trial. In this paper an estimand for this trial design is proposed. An estimand should state how intercurrent events are handled. Intercurrent events are events that occur after the start of the trial and that affect the endpoint's measurement or interpretation or prevent its observation. In IVI trials the intercurrent events of interest are immunological intercurrent events (IIEs). Major IIEs are identified, i.e., protocol deviations occurring during the trial that affect immunogenicity endpoints, and the consequences for the trial data collection are discussed. In the statistical analysis endpoint values that are missing or excluded from the analysis due to IIEs are to be substituted by plausible values, by means of multiple imputing. Replacing values are based on predictors of the endpoint. A distinction is made between mandatory and non-mandatory predictors. Mandatory predictors are predictors necessary to prevent biased prediction. Non-mandatory predictors are predictors that limit the additional variance due to the imputing. The four steps of the multiple imputing are explained, and available software is listed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.005 | DOI Listing |
Therapie
December 2024
CHU Lille, University Lille, Intensive Médecine Reanimation, 59000 Lille, France.
J Patient Rep Outcomes
December 2024
Eli Lilly and Company, 639 S. Delaware St, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46285, USA.
Background: Time to deterioration (TTD) endpoints are often utilized in the analysis of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data in oncology clinical trials but different endpoint definitions and analysis frameworks exist that can impact result interpretation. This review examined the analysis, reporting and heterogeneity of TTD endpoints in the literature, the impact of analysis methods on results, and provides recommendations for future trials.
Methods: A targeted literature review of articles published between 2017 and 2022 was performed to collate TTD endpoints reported in oncology randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Aten Primaria
November 2024
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Emisora, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, España.
Br J Clin Pharmacol
November 2024
Statistical Innovation, Respiratory and Immunology Biometrics and Statistical Innovation, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use has published an addendum on estimands and sensitivity analysis in clinical trials along with related training materials. These define an estimand as a precise description of the treatment effect that reflects the scientific question of interest. In December 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration released draft guidance recommending estimands of interest be specified in bioequivalence trial protocols.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Res Methodol
November 2024
Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. box 9600, Postzone S-05-S, Leiden, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) play an increasing role in the evaluation of oncology treatments. At the same time, single-arm trials are commonly included in regulatory approval submissions. Because of the high risk of biases, results from single-arm trials require careful interpretation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!