Cross-national analysis of the prevalence of prolonged grief disorder.

J Affect Disord

ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, Diemen, Netherlands; Nivel-Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands; Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Published: April 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is now recognized internationally, but most research has focused on Western populations, with limited understanding of its prevalence and factors influencing it in non-Western countries.
  • Analysis of data from 24 studies across 16 countries found PGD prevalence averages about 13%, with higher rates associated with older sample ages and lower country vulnerability, while sampling methods also affected results.
  • The study emphasizes the need for high-quality methodological approaches and suggests that PGD is more prevalent in countries with better access to resources, reflecting how sociocultural contexts influence grief processing, warranting further cross-national research.

Article Abstract

Background: Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is now included as a diagnosis in international classification systems. Most research on PGD is based on Western populations, but first data from non-Western countries have recently become available. Little is still known about country-related effects on PGD's prevalence.

Objective: Determining possible causes of variations in the prevalence of PGD as defined by DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 within and between countries.

Methods: We retrieved data from 24 prevalence studies, the World Bank and the 2022 World Risk Report. Negative binomial regressions were used to explore methodological, loss-related and country context characteristics as predictors of PGD. The average rate of PGD was calculated using random effects models.

Results: The included studies comprised 34 samples from 16 countries (20,347 participants). Non-probability sampling and older mean age of the sample as well as lower country vulnerability were associated with higher PGD rates. The average PGD prevalence was 13 % (95 % CI [11, 22]), varying from 5 % (95 % CI [3, 11]) in probability to 16 % (95 % CI [13, 25]) in non-probability samples.

Limitations: Samples from Europe and North America were overrepresented. For about half of the countries, data were available from only one sample.

Conclusions: While confirming the importance of studies' methodological quality, the results show that PGD is of public health relevance around the world, but especially common in less vulnerabled countries with better access to daily necessities and healthcare services, highlighting sociocultural impacts on grief processing. Further investigations of cross-national differences are needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.094DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prolonged grief
8
grief disorder
8
pgd
8
cross-national analysis
4
prevalence
4
analysis prevalence
4
prevalence prolonged
4
disorder background
4
background prolonged
4
disorder pgd
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!