A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an important imaging tool for diagnosing heart issues and helping with treatment decisions, especially for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) who often face arrhythmias and cardiomyopathy.
  • Over the past 16 years, advancements in both CIED and CMR technologies, as well as MR safety knowledge, underline the need for updated guidelines to ensure safe use of CMR in patients with these devices.
  • The SCMR Expert Consensus Statement aims to bridge existing knowledge gaps by combining expert opinions and current data, ultimately supporting evidence-based practices for using CMR in CIED patients.

Article Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a proven imaging modality for informing diagnosis and prognosis, guiding therapeutic decisions, and risk stratifying surgical intervention. Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) would be expected to derive particular benefit from CMR given high prevalence of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia. While several guidelines have been published over the last 16 years, it is important to recognize that both the CIED and CMR technologies, as well as our knowledge in MR safety, have evolved rapidly during that period. Given increasing utilization of CIED over the past decades, there is an unmet need to establish a consensus statement that integrates latest evidence concerning MR safety and CIED and CMR technologies. While experienced centers currently perform CMR in CIED patients, broad availability of CMR in this population is lacking, partially due to limited availability of resources for programming devices and appropriate monitoring, but also related to knowledge gaps regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR in this growing population. To address the knowledge gaps, this SCMR Expert Consensus Statement integrates consensus guidelines, primary data, and opinions from experts across disparate fields towards the shared goal of informing evidenced-based decision-making regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR for patients with CIEDs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211236PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.100995DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

consensus statement
12
scmr expert
8
expert consensus
8
cardiovascular magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
patients cardiac
8
cardiac implantable
8
implantable electronic
8
electronic device
8
cmr
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!