Perceptions of COVID-19 Risk: How Did People Adapt to the Novel Risk?

Med Decis Making

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Sciences Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Published: February 2024

Background: There is limited understanding of how risk perceptions changed as the US population gained experience with COVID-19. The objectives were to examine risk perceptions and determine the factors associated with risk perceptions and how these changed over the first 18 mo of the pandemic.

Methods: Seven cross-sectional online surveys were fielded between May 2020 and October 2021. The study included a population-weighted sample of 138,303 US adults drawn from a market research platform, with an average 68% cooperation rate. Respondents' risk perception of developing COVID in the next 30 days was assessed at each time point. We examined relationships between 30-day risk perceptions and various factors (including sociodemographic features, health, COVID-19 experience, political affiliation, and psychological variables).

Results: COVID risk perceptions were stable across the 2020 surveys and showed a significant decrease in the 2021 surveys. Several factors, including older age, worse health, high COVID worry, in-person employment type, higher income, Democratic political party affiliation (the relatively more liberal party in the United States), low tolerance of uncertainty, and high anxiety were strongly associated with higher 30-d risk perceptions in 2020. One notable change occurred in 2021, in that younger adults (aged 18-29 y) had significantly higher 30-d risk perceptions than older adults did (aged 65 y and older) after vaccination. Initial differences in perception by political party attenuated over time. Higher 30-d risk perceptions were significantly associated with engaging in preventive behaviors.

Limitations: Cross-sectional samples, risk perception item focused on incidence not severity.

Conclusions: COVID risk perceptions decreased over time. Understanding the longitudinal pattern of risk perceptions and the factors associated with 30-d risk perceptions over time provides valuable insights to guide public health communication campaigns.

Highlights: The study assessed COVID-19 risk perceptions at 7 time points over 18 mo of the pandemic in large samples of US adults.Risk perceptions were fairly stable until the introduction of vaccines in early 2021, at which point they showed a marked reduction.Higher COVID-19 30-d risk perceptions were significantly associated with the preventive behaviors of masking, limiting social contact, avoiding restaurants, and not entertaining visitors at home.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253572PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X231221448DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk perceptions
52
30-d risk
20
risk
16
perceptions
15
higher 30-d
12
covid-19 risk
8
perceptions changed
8
factors associated
8
risk perception
8
perceptions factors
8

Similar Publications

This study investigated whether parental socialization of negative emotions moderated the relationship between adolescents' low executive function or high impulsivity and their current or subsequent emotion dysregulation. Emotion dysregulation, characterized by difficulties in managing the intensity and duration of emotions, is a transdiagnostic factor linked to adverse outcomes. Youth with poor executive functioning and/or high impulsivity are at risk for emotion dysregulation; however, the role of parenting in influencing this trajectory warrants exploration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to address growing logistical and economic pressures on the health care system by reducing risk, increasing productivity, and improving patient safety; however, implementing digital health technologies can be disruptive. Workforce perception is a powerful indicator of technology use and acceptance, however, there is little research available on the perceptions of allied health professionals (AHPs) toward AI in health care.

Objective: This study aimed to explore AHP perceptions of AI and the opportunities and challenges for its use in health care delivery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Public health interventions reduce infection risk, while imposing significant costs on both individuals and the society. Interventions can also lead to behavioral changes, as individuals weigh the cost and benefits of avoiding infection. Aggregate epidemiological models typically focus on the population-level consequences of interventions, often not incorporating the mechanisms driving behavioral adaptations associated with interventions compliance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • E-commerce struggles with issues like content sameness and user anxiety about making purchases, prompting a study on perceived risk based on online reviews.
  • The study used a dataset of over 262,000 reviews and a predictive model that effectively identified 11 key factors impacting perceived risk, achieving high accuracy metrics (precision of 84%, recall of 86%, F1 score of 85%).
  • Key features influencing perceived risk vary by product type; for electronics, quality, functionality, and price are crucial, while for skincare, skin safety is the top concern, highlighting differences in risk perception.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!