AI Article Synopsis

  • * A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate if a hospital-wide pharmacovigilance (PV) team’s clarification of antibiotic ADRs affected the likelihood of safe re-prescribing of those antibiotics in a pediatric hospital.
  • * Results showed that patients with clarified ADRs had a higher chance of being prescribed the same drug class, without any increase in adverse events within 30 days, indicating that PV can enhance patient safety and optimize prescribing practices.

Article Abstract

Documentation of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is a key factor in guiding future prescribing. However, incomplete documentation is common and often fails to distinguish implicated drugs as true allergies. This in turn leads to unnecessary avoidance of implicated drug classes and may result in sub-optimal prescribing. Pharmacovigilance (PV) programs utilize a systematic approach to clarify ADR documentation and are known to improve patient safety. Yet it remains unclear if PV alters prescribing. Or, if the existence of the ADR documentation itself continues to prompt avoidance of implicated drugs. To address this, our work presents a retrospective cohort study assessing if clarification of antibiotic ADRs by a hospital-wide PV team was associated with future, safe, re-prescribing at a freestanding pediatric hospital in the midwestern United States. First, we compared the likelihood of future prescribing in an antibiotic class with an active ADR, as compared to alternative drug classes, between PV-clarified and non-clarified patients. Second, we assessed differences in adverse event rates 30-days after future prescribing based on PV clarification status. For robustness, analyses were performed on patients with ADRs in four antibiotic classes: penicillin-based beta-lactams (n = 45,642), sulfonamides/trimethoprim (n = 5,329), macrolides (n = 3,959), and glycopeptides (n = 622). Results illustrate that clarification of an ADR by PV was associated with an increased odds of future prescribing in the same drug class (Odds Ratio [95%-CI]): penicillin-based beta-lactams (1.59 [1.36-1.89]), sulfonamides/trimethoprim (2.29 [0.89-4.91]), macrolides (0.77 [0.33-1.61]), and glycopeptide (1.85 [1.12-3.20]). Notably, patients clarified by PV experienced no increase in the rate of adverse events within 30-days following the prescribing of antibiotics in the same class as an active ADR. Overall, this study provides strong evidence that PV reviews safely increase the rate of re-prescribing antibiotics even in the presence of an existing implicated drug ADR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786368PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295410PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

future prescribing
16
adverse drug
8
drug reactions
8
re-prescribing freestanding
8
united states
8
implicated drugs
8
avoidance implicated
8
implicated drug
8
drug classes
8
adr documentation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!