Introduction: Simulated patients (SPs) play an instrumental role in teaching communication skills and enhancing learning outcomes. Prior research mostly focused on the SP's contribution to students' learning outcomes by providing feedback afterwards. A detailed understanding of the contribution of the SP during SP-student encounters is currently lacking although the majority of the interaction between SPs and students occurs during the SP-student encounter. Therefore, this study focuses on how SPs see their contribution to meaningful student learning experiences during SP-student encounters.
Methods: We interviewed fifteen simulated patients from one institution. We explored their perspectives on meaningful learning experiences during SP-student encounters through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results: SPs view their contribution to meaningful student learning during SP-student encounters from two perspectives. A collective perspective as a member of the community of SPs and an individual perspective. From the collective perspective, SPs believe that the fact that students deal with multiple varied SP-student encounters over time is of value for meaningful learning. From the individual perspective, we noticed that SPs think, act, and react from three different positions. First, as the patient in the role description, second, as a teaching aid and third, as an individual with personal experiences, beliefs, and values. SPs mentioned that the ratio between these different positions can vary within and between encounters.
Conclusions: According to SPs, we should value the variation between SPs, thereby creating meaningful variation in authentic interactions in SP-student encounters. SPs should be allowed to act and react from different positions during SP-student encounters, including their role description, as teaching aid, and based on their own experiences. In this way, SP-student encounters are optimized to contribute to meaningful student learning through authenticity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10782599 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00277-w | DOI Listing |
Adv Simul (Lond)
January 2024
Skillslab, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Introduction: Simulated patients (SPs) play an instrumental role in teaching communication skills and enhancing learning outcomes. Prior research mostly focused on the SP's contribution to students' learning outcomes by providing feedback afterwards. A detailed understanding of the contribution of the SP during SP-student encounters is currently lacking although the majority of the interaction between SPs and students occurs during the SP-student encounter.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAcad Med
November 2022
M. Ju is assistant clinical professor, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, and associate education director, University of California, San Francisco Kanbar Center for Simulation, San Francisco, California.
Purpose: Standardized patient (SP) encounters are widely used in health professional education to evaluate trainees' clinical skills. Prior literature suggests that bias can influence the evaluations of student learners in SP-student encounters. Understanding how SPs perceive bias in their work and how they view their role in mitigating or perpetuating bias in simulation is an important first step in addressing bias in the SP-student encounter.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPerspect Med Educ
December 2021
Skillslab, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Introduction: Communication training with simulated patients (SPs) is widely accepted as a valuable and effective means of teaching communication skills. However, it is unclear which elements within SP-student encounters make these learning experiences meaningful. This study focuses on the SP's role during meaningful learning of the student by giving an in-depth understanding of the contribution of the SP from a student perspective.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedEdPORTAL
September 2016
Pharmacy Clerkship Student, Pennsylvania State University College.
Introduction: A disconnect appears to exist for medical students between learning drug facts in a basic science context and applying those facts in a clinical context when they begin working with authentic patients. In patients with kidney dysfunction, dosages of medications that are renally eliminated often need to be adjusted, due to potentially toxic accumulation in the body. To gain insight into the thought processes and gaps underlying student thinking, we developed this standardized patient (SP) case featuring a patient with drug-related renal dysfunction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAcad Med
April 1995
Department of Medical Education, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (SIUSM), Springfield, USA.
Purpose: To compare two methods of rating students' performances on history and physical examination: (1) by using checklists completed by standardized patients (SPs) and databases completed by students, and (2) by using ratings of students by three physicians for each SP-student encounter.
Method: Four cases were chosen for the study, and 30 students were examined per case. The students were all in their fourth year at the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine in the spring of 1991.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!