To determine optimal methods of reoperation, experience with 157 secondary procedures for unilateral aortofemoral graft limb occlusion in 110 patients during a 16-year period was reviewed. In earlier years, inflow was reestablished by direct replacement of the graft limb or entire graft (11%); more recently, graft limb thrombectomy has been used most frequently (68%) with equal success, durability, and less morbidity. Femorofemoral grafts from the patent contralateral graft limb were employed in 18% of patients, usually those in whom thrombectomy was not attempted. Thrombolytic therapy (3%) appears to offer little advantage, is time-consuming, and occasionally causes significant complications. In addition to reestablishment of inflow, most patients also required revision of the femoral anastomosis to improve profunda femoris runoff; this was usually best accomplished by short segmental extension of the graft limb to the more distal deep femoral artery. Concomitant femoropopliteal bypass was done in 32% of patients and is indicated when preoperative angiography or specific intraoperative findings suggest inadequate profunda femoris outflow. An aggressive approach to reoperation appeared justified by long-term results (mean follow-up 37 months). Despite the need for repetitive reoperation in 26% of patients (two to five reoperations), graft limb patency was ultimately maintained in 78% and limb salvage achieved in 67% of patients, with an operative mortality rate of only 1.9%.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.1987.avs0050363DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

graft limb
28
graft
8
aortofemoral graft
8
limb
8
limb occlusion
8
optimal methods
8
profunda femoris
8
patients
6
reoperation
4
reoperation aortofemoral
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!