Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The impact of routine screening with digital rectal examination for carcinoma of the prostate on stage distribution of the disease was assessed in the primary treatment population of our medical center. Two, 5-year periods were compared: 1974 to 1978--before the onset of routine screening and 1979 to 1983--during the period of routine screening of this population. The clinical stage distribution of prostatic cancer before the onset of routine screening was not significantly different from national averages. Routine screening during the latter period significantly increased the percentage of patients with clinically curable carcinoma of the prostate. Pathologically, the disease was upstaged in many patients in both series. Digital rectal examination can have a significant impact on early detection of carcinoma of the prostate within a given population but it cannot be interpreted as a panacea for this disease.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44055-9 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!