Background: After-hour calls can be resource intensive and remain a significant challenge to medical practices, though they have historically been poorly or non-reimbursable services. This study reviews after-hour calls from hematology/oncology patients at a cancer center to characterize after-hour care needs, identify care gaps, and look for opportunities to improve outpatient healthcare delivery.
Methods: This descriptive, retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved study analyzed patient calls between June 2015 to February 2021 in an academic hematology/oncology practice. Data from 500 calls were reviewed and cataloged into a database including patient demographics, clinical history, and information surrounding the call (e.g., primary reason for the call, outcome of the call). Calls were also categorized as being urgent or not from a patient or provider's perspective.
Results: Among 500 calls, representing 398 unique patients, the average patient was 62 years old and 52% of calls were from females. Most calls were made to report symptoms (65%), followed by calls to follow-up on labs, tests, or imaging (13%), and clarifying treatment plans (10%). Oncology patients represented 67% of calls and hematology (malignant and benign) patients represented 33%. More specifically, patients with gastrointestinal cancer (25%), hematologic malignancies (24%), and thoracic cancer (13%) represented the diagnoses with the highest call volume.
Conclusions: This study explores the complexity and variety of after-hour cancer patient calls. By systematically exploring patient calls, this data can provide insight into patients' needs outside of regular clinic times and help practices develop strategies to anticipate these needs, reduce after-hour call burden, and improve overall quality of care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/apm-23-80 | DOI Listing |
BMC Public Health
January 2025
Department of Research and Development, Central Denmark Region, The Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Brendstrupgaardsvej 7, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
Background: While most Danish citizens never or very rarely call the national emergency helpline, 1-1-2, a few citizens call very often. In this article, we attend to the often-unheard voices of frequent callers, exploring why these citizens call 1-1-2 and why they often do not feel helped.
Methods: The article is based on a mixed-methods study on citizens in the Central Denmark Region who had called 1-1-2 five or more times during a period of six months in 2023.
Nature
January 2025
Antarctic Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
The fate of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) is the largest cause of uncertainty in long-term sea-level projections. In the last interglacial (LIG) around 125,000 years ago, data suggest that sea level was several metres higher than today, and required a significant contribution from Antarctic ice loss, with WAIS usually implicated. Antarctica and the Southern Ocean were warmer than today, by amounts comparable to those expected by 2100 under moderate to high future warming scenarios.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCommun Psychol
January 2025
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, USA.
The field of psychology has rapidly transformed its open science practices in recent years. Yet there has been limited progress in integrating principles of diversity, equity and inclusion. In this Perspective, we raise the spectre of Questionable Generalisability Practices and the issue of MASKing (Making Assumptions based on Skewed Knowledge), calling for more responsible practices in generalising study findings and co-authorship to promote global equity in knowledge production.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFResolving the molecular basis of a Mendelian condition remains challenging owing to the diverse mechanisms by which genetic variants cause disease. To address this, we developed a synchronized long-read genome, methylome, epigenome and transcriptome sequencing approach, which enables accurate single-nucleotide, insertion-deletion and structural variant calling and diploid de novo genome assembly. This permits the simultaneous elucidation of haplotype-resolved CpG methylation, chromatin accessibility and full-length transcript information in a single long-read sequencing run.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosci
January 2025
Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras, San Juan 00926, Puerto Rico
Despite significant strides in gender equity, the Nobel Prizes in STEM fields continue to exhibit glaring disparities in the recognition of women's contributions to science. Thirty years ago, only 3% of Nobel laureates in science were women; today, that number has increased marginally to 4%, raising the critical question: Why "still" so few? This opinion piece examines systemic inequities and structural barriers that hinder the equitable acknowledgment of women's and underrepresented groups' contributions to science. Data reveal that while women now comprise a significant proportion of degree recipients and workforce entrants in fields such as biomedical research and chemistry, their representation among Nobel laureates remains disproportionately low.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!