Validating computer applications for calculating spatial resolution and noise property in CT using simulated images with known properties.

Radiol Phys Technol

Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-0942, Japan.

Published: March 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to assess the accuracy of various computer applications for calculating modulation transfer function (MTF), task transfer function (TTF), and noise power spectrum (NPS) in computed tomography (CT) using simulated images with known values.
  • - Results showed that while the MTF calculations using the wire method were highly accurate (less than 1% error), the TTF methods (CE and LE) and NPS exhibited larger errors (up to 50% and 30% respectively) at high frequencies.
  • - The errors were found to stem from limitations in measurement techniques rather than the applications themselves, and improving measurement conditions significantly reduced these errors, confirming the validity of the calculation techniques used.

Article Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, using simulated images with known property values, how accurately some computer applications for calculating modulation transfer function (MTF), task transfer function (TTF), or noise power spectrum (NPS) in computed tomography (CT) based on widely known techniques produce their results. Specifically, they were three applications applicable to the wire method for MTF calculation, two applications corresponding to the circular edge (CE) and linear edge (LE) methods for TTF, and one application using a two-dimensional Fourier transform for NPS, which are collectively integrated with the software 'CTmeasure' provided by the Japanese Society of CT Technology. Images for the calculation with radial symmetry were generated based on a roll-off type filter function. The accuracy of each application was evaluated by comparing the calculated property with the true one. The calculated MTFs for the wire method accurately matched the true ones with percentage errors of smaller than 1.0%. In contrast, the CE and LE methods presented relatively large errors of up to 50% at high frequencies, whereas the NPS's errors were up to 30%. A closer investigation revealed, however, that these errors were attributable not to the applications but to the insufficiencies in the measurement techniques commonly employed. By improving the measurement conditions to minimize the effects of the insufficiencies, the errors notably decreased, whichvalidated the calculation techniques in the applications we used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00771-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

computer applications
8
applications calculating
8
simulated images
8
transfer function
8
wire method
8
applications
6
errors
5
validating computer
4
calculating spatial
4
spatial resolution
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!