AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined the effectiveness of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in identifying cognitive impairment in older adults from diverse ethnic and linguistic backgrounds, specifically in the Bronx, NY.* -
  • Researchers recruited 231 participants aged 65 and older, administering the MoCA in both Spanish and English, and used neuropsychological evaluations to determine their cognitive status, finding significant differences in average MoCA scores based on demographic factors.* -
  • The findings suggested that the standard cutoffs for MoCA scores were too high, resulting in many false positives for mild cognitive impairment (MCI); adjusted lower cutpoints for both language versions were proposed to enhance diagnostic accuracy.*

Article Abstract

Background: Efficacy and validity of the MoCA for cognitive screening in ethnoculturally and linguistically diverse settings is unclear. We sought to examine the utility and discriminative validity of the Spanish and English MoCA versions to identify cognitive impairment among diverse community-dwelling older adults.

Methods: Participants aged ≥65 with cognitive concerns attending outpatient primary care in Bronx, NY, were recruited. MoCA and neuropsychological measures were administered in Spanish or English, and a neuropsychologist determined cognitive status (normal with subjective cognitive concerns [SCC], mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and dementia). One-way ANOVA compared cognitive statuses. ROC analyses identified optimal MoCA cutpoints for discriminating possible cognitive impairment.

Results: There were 231 participants, with mean age 73, 72% women, 43% Hispanic; 39% Black/African American; 113 (49%) completed testing in English and 118 (51%) in Spanish. Overall MoCA mean was 17.7 (SD = 4.3). Neuropsychological assessment identified 90 as cognitively normal/SCC, average MoCA 19.9 (SD = 4.1), 133 with MCI, average MoCA 16.6 (SD = 3.7), and 8 with dementia, average MoCA 10.6 (SD = 3.1). Mean English MoCA average was 18.6 (SD = 4.1) versus Spanish 16.7 (SD = 4.3). The published cutpoint ≤23 for MCI yielded a high false-positive rate (79%). ROC analyses identified ≤18.5 as the score to identify MCI or dementia using the English MoCA (65% sensitivity; 77% specificity) and ≤16.5 for the Spanish MoCA (64% sensitivity;73% specificity) in this sample of older adults with cognitive concerns.

Conclusions: Current MoCA cutpoints were inappropriately high in a culturally/linguistically diverse urban setting, leading to a high false-positive rate. Lower Spanish and English MoCA cutpoints may improve diagnostic accuracy for identifying cognitive impairment in this group, highlighting the need for the creation and validation of accurate cognitive screeners for ethnoculturally and linguistically diverse older adults.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10947962PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18705DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

english moca
16
moca
13
spanish english
12
cognitive impairment
12
moca cutpoints
12
average moca
12
cognitive
11
primary care
8
ethnoculturally linguistically
8
linguistically diverse
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!