A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A comparative study of translucency and color perception in monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate veneers. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates the effect of thickness on the optical properties and color perception of monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate laminate veneers.
  • A total of 60 veneers were tested in various thicknesses (0.5, 0.7, and 1.0 mm) using color measurement techniques to analyze their translucency and color differences.
  • Results indicated that zirconia veneers had lower translucency than lithium disilicate, and changes in thickness affected translucency but not color perception for zirconia veneers.

Article Abstract

Ceramic laminate veneers which are a conservative approach to restoring anterior teeth, combining minimal preparation and esthetics This study aims to evaluate the impact of the thickness of monolithic zirconia laminate veneers on their optical properties and color perception, comparing them to lithium disilicate. A total of 60 laminate veneers were prepared using two ceramic materials, divided into three groups for each material (n = 10) with thicknesses of 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0 mm. CIELab color parameters of the veneers were measured using a spectrophotometer and translucency parameters were calculated. The veneers were cemented onto uniform dies and final L, a, b values of the restorations were measured. The color difference between the different thicknesses was calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni HSD post hoc tests were conducted to compare the color parameters (α = 0.05). The results showed that both material type (p < 0.001) and thickness (p < 0.001) influenced translucency values. The translucency values of zirconia veneers were significantly lower than those of lithium disilicate. The color differences (ΔE00) resulting from thickness changes (0.5-1.0 mm) were near or below the perception threshold for lithium disilicate, but distinct for zirconia restorations. In conclusion, monolithic zirconia veneers demonstrated lower translucency compared to lithium disilicate. Changing the material thickness affected the translucency of both materials, but not the color perception only for zirconia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10772169PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23789DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laminate veneers
12
color perception
8
monolithic zirconia
8
lithium disilicate
8
color parameters
8
veneers
6
color
5
comparative study
4
study translucency
4
translucency color
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!