Comparison of endovascular interventional embolization and microsurgical clipping for ruptured cerebral aneurysms: impact on patient outcomes.

Objective: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of endovascular interventional embolization and microsurgical clipping in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms and investigate their subsequent influence on inflammatory indices, neurological function, prognosis, and recovery.

Methods: The two groups were compared in terms of surgery duration, hospital stay, Hunt-Hess classification, and inflammatory indices before and after the surgery, as well as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Baethel Index (BI), and one-year prognosis of patients affected.

Results: The surgery duration and hospital stay of the intervention group were (116.27 ± 12.32) min and (19.82 ± 2.26) d, respectively, and those of the clipping group was (173.87 ± 10.39) min and (24.11 ± 2.33) d, respectively (both  < 0.05). Neither the intervention nor the microscopic approach had a significant impact on the severity of the patients' conditions in terms of Hunt-Hess classification ( > 0.05). In the intervention group, CRP was changed to (5.31 ± 1.22) mg/L and PCT decreased to (1.17 ± 0.39) μg/L after the surgery, while the corresponding values in clipping group were (9.78 ± 2.35) mg/L and (2.75 ± 0.81) μg/L ( > 0.05). After surgery, both groups' NIHSS scores declined dramatically, with the intervention group scoring lower than the microscopy group (6.81 ± 1.22 vs 8.72 ± 1.27) ( < 0.05).

Conclusion: The findings of this study support the potential advantages of endovascular interventional embolization (coiling) over microsurgical clipping for the management of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. These advantages include shorter surgical duration, reduced hospital stay, lower inflammatory response, improved neurological and functional outcomes, and better long-term prognosis.