Approval, Evidence, and "Off-Label" Device Utilization: The Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Story.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Y.D., X.Y., S.T.S.).

Published: January 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study analyzed off-label use of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure across various conditions, like migraines and strokes, among patients with insurance from 2006 to 2019, finding that the procedure's use increased over time.
  • - Out of 5,315 patients who underwent PFO closure, the majority (58.6%) were for stroke/systemic embolism, while a significant portion (almost 50%) received the procedure for unapproved indications, highlighting a disconnect with regulatory guidelines.
  • - The findings suggest that PFO closure rates did not meaningfully align with clinical trial advancements or regulatory approvals, indicating a need for better coordination between regulators and payers to prioritize patient safety by encouraging use for

Article Abstract

Background: Following regulatory approval, medical devices may be used "off-label." Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is indicated to reduce recurrent stroke but has been proposed for other indications, including migraine, transient ischemic attack, and diving decompression illness. We sought to evaluate PFO closure rates and indications relative to the timing of regulatory approval and publication of key randomized trials.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the OptumLabs Data Warehouse of US commercial insurance enrollees from 2006 to 2019. We quantified PFO closure among individuals with ≥2 years of preprocedure coverage to establish indications, classified hierarchically as stroke/systemic embolism, migraine, transient ischemia attack, or other.

Results: We identified 5315 patients undergoing PFO closure (51.8% female, 29.2%≥60 years old), which increased from 4.75 per 100 000 person-years in 2006 to 6.60 per 100 000 person-years in 2019. Patients aged ≥60 years accounted for 29.2% of closures. Procedure volumes corresponded weakly with supportive clinical publications and device approval. Among patients with PFO closure, 58.6% underwent closure for stroke/systemic embolism, 10.2% for transient ischemia attack, 8.8% for migraine, and 22.4% for other indications; 17.6% of patients had atrial fibrillation at baseline; and 11.9% developed atrial fibrillation postprocedure. Those aged ≥60 years and male were less likely to undergo closure for migraine than stroke/systemic embolism.

Conclusions: From 2006 to 2019, PFO closure use was consistently low and corresponded weakly with clinical trial publications and regulatory status. Nearly half of patients underwent PFO closure for indications unapproved by the Food and Drug Administration. Regulators and payers should coordinate mechanisms to promote utilization for approved indications to ensure patient safety and should facilitate clinical trials for other possible indications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10844981PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010200DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pfo closure
28
closure
10
patent foramen
8
foramen ovale
8
regulatory approval
8
migraine transient
8
2006 2019
8
stroke/systemic embolism
8
transient ischemia
8
ischemia attack
8

Similar Publications

Background: Since patients with congenital heart defects (CHD) frequently require life-long medical care and repeat invasive treatment, radiation exposure during interventional procedures is a relevant issue concerning potential radiation related risks. Therefore, an analysis on radiation data from the German Registry for Cardiac Operations and Interventions in patients with CHD was performed.

Methods: From January 2012 until December 2020 a total of 28,374 cardiac catheter interventions were recorded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to investigate the metabolic mechanisms underlying the combination of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and migraine by assessing metabolite expression before and after interventional occlusion surgery. The study included 11 PFO patients from the Heart Center of Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, who underwent transcatheter PFO intervention and occlusion surgery between January 2018 and February 2023, and 11 healthy controls. Blood samples were collected pre-surgery, 3 days post-surgery, and 30 days post-surgery for metabolomics analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We aimed to evaluate the incidence of residual shunt after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and analyze the anatomical features of PFO to determine the risk factors for significant residual shunt after PFO closure. Ninety-two patients who underwent PFO closure at our center between September 2021 and June 2022 were consecutively enrolled. Transthoracic saline contrast echocardiography was performed at 6 and 12 months postoperatively to evaluate the presence of a significant residual shunt.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Arrhythmias Following Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: An Unsolved Enigma.

Life (Basel)

December 2024

First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Vas. Sofias 114, 11527 Athens, Greece.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has proven to be an effective method of reducing the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of unknown origin (ESUS). One of the most recognized post-procedural complications is the de novo occurrence of supraventricular arrhythmias, mainly atrial fibrillation, in the first three months following PFO closure. Earlier studies reported the incidence to be around 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the short-term efficacy of right-to-left shunt closure in vestibular migraine patients, and compare the efficacy between patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM) embolization. Additionally, the study identifies factors related to surgical outcomes.

Methods: Forty-one patients with vestibular migraine and medium to large right-to-left shunts underwent surgery: PFO closure, PAVM embolization, or both.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!