AI Article Synopsis

  • Recent advances in computational fluid dynamics allow for the non-invasive calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR), but the process is slow; this study develops a machine learning model to improve speed and accuracy in assessing stenosis significance.
  • A reduced-order lumped parameter model of the coronary and cardiovascular systems was created, integrated with a machine learning algorithm for predicting flow resistance based on anatomical features, and personalized for individual patients.
  • In a study involving 91 patients with 93 lesions, the machine learning-based FFR method demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (91.4%) and a strong correlation (r=0.86) with traditional invasive FFR, making it a promising tool for efficiently evaluating heart disease.

Article Abstract

Background And Objective: Recently, computational fluid dynamics enables the non-invasive calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on 3D coronary model, but it is time-consuming. Currently, machine learning technique has emerged as an efficient and reliable approach for prediction, which allows saving a lot of analysis time. This study aimed at developing a simplified FFR prediction model for rapid and accurate assessment of functional significance of stenosis.

Methods: A reduced-order lumped parameter model (LPM) of coronary system and cardiovascular system was constructed for rapidly simulating coronary flow, in which a machine learning model was embedded for accurately predicting stenosis flow resistance at a given flow from anatomical features of stenosis. Importantly, the LPM was personalized in both structures and parameters according to coronary geometries from computed tomography angiography and physiological measurements such as blood pressure and cardiac output for personalized simulations of coronary pressure and flow. Coronary lesions with invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 were defined as hemodynamically significant.

Results: A total of 91 patients (93 lesions) who underwent invasive FFR were involved in FFR derived from machine learning (FFR) calculation. Of the 93 lesions, 27 lesions (29.0%) showed lesion-specific ischemia. The average time of FFR simulation was about 10 min. On a per-vessel basis, the FFR and FFR were significantly correlated (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 91.4%, 92.6%, 90.9%, 80.6% and 96.8%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of FFR was 0.984.

Conclusion: In this selected cohort of patients, the FFR improves the computational efficiency and ensures the accuracy. The favorable performance of FFR approach greatly facilitates its potential application in detecting hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis in future routine clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102744DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

machine learning
16
fractional flow
8
flow reserve
8
coronary model
8
stenosis flow
8
flow resistance
8
ffr
8
flow
7
coronary
7
model
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!